- News + Media
Interdisciplinary Research Group 1 - Origins, Institutions, and Communities
Reliable knowledge about nanotechnology’s contemporary social, economic, and policy implications must be based on a comprehensive and robust understanding of its historical contexts. Nanotechnology borrows heavily from people, organizations, and methods that pre-date the founding of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. Scientists, policymakers, and the public borrow on long-standing viewpoints in evaluating nano’s potential. Those borrowings shape how nanotechnology is done, perceived, and regulated.
Our work examines these historical underpinnings at multiple levels – scientists’ careers, institutions, research communities, instrumentation, national and state policy, and the public’s evolving perception of nanotechnology. Investigating the “deep history” of a broad set of communities and institutions helps us understand the resources available to the early nano-proponents, and ultimately allows us to understand how those resources constrained and enabled particular aspects of the nano-enterprise. This “practical past” therefore has intellectual value for the social scientist as well as the historian, and has special relevance for scientists and policy makers. (More...)
IRG 1 comprises: W. Patrick McCray, Group Leader and member of the CNS Executive Committee, David C. Brock (Chemical Heritage Foundation), Hyungsub Choi (Seoul National University ), Matthew Eisler (UCSB), Roger Eardley-Pryor (UCSB), Cyrus Mody (Rice University), Mara Mills (New York University), Joseph November (University of South Carolina).
Research Projects: The nano-enterprise sprawls over a vast landscape which includes academic, governmental, and corporate entities as well as diverse publics, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and points of intersection with other emerging technologies. IRG1 research projects have focused on the following areas.
1. Nanotechnology and the Pacific Rim