- News + Media
Achieving Equitable Outcomes Through Emerging Technologies: A Social Empowerment Approach. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 40-46.(2012).
Perspective: What have the Mass Media been Reporting on Nanotechnology Risks?. ( , Ed.).Nanotechnology and the Public: Risk Perception and Risk Communication. 157-165.(2012).
A Longitudinal Study of Newspaper and Wire Service Coverage of Nanotechnology Risks. Risk Analysis. 31, 1701-1717.(2011).
The University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology. Environmental Science and Technology. 43, 6453-6457.(2009).
Amplification of Risk. Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology. 669-670.(2010).
Reflections from Dr Barbara Herr Harhorn. A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. pg 43.(2009).
Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in US Nanotech Deliberations. ( , Ed.).Quantum Engagements—Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies.(2011).
Anthropological research at the UCSB Center for Nanotechnology in Society. Practicing Anthropology. 28, 38-40.(2006).
Attenuation of Risk. <i>Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology</i>. 671-672.(2010).
Public participation in nanotechnology – should we care? . 2020 Science .(2010).
Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 188-197.(2012).
Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. AZoM.com.(2009).
Methodological Challenges Posed by Emergent Nanotechnologies and Cultural Values. ( , Ed.).The Handbook of Emergent Technologies and Social Research.(2011).
Gender and Nanotechnology. Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology. 269-271.(2010).
Nano-buzz: Social Dimensions of Emerging Technologies. Anthropology News. 47, 26.(2006).
Debating Nanoethics: U.S. Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology Applications for Energy and the Environment. ( , Ed.).Debating Science: Deliberation, Values, and the Common Good. 227-249.(2012).
Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper]. Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting.(2010).
Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US. University of Washington Center for Workforce Development.(2009).
Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system. Science. 322, 1797-1798.(2008).
Tracking the Current Rise of Chinese Pharmaceutical Bionanotechnology. Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Innovation. 4, 38.(2009).
Implications of Nanotechnology for Labor and Employment: Assessing Nanotechnology Products in Brazil. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 140-152.(2012).
The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation. Environmental Science and Technology. 43, 3030-3034.(2009).
Vi är dina provexemplar - om etnografiskt fältarbete i laboratoriemiljö (We are your samples - On ethnographic fieldwork in laboratory environments). ( , Ed.).Att tänka genom kulturer (To think through cultures).(2010).
Technological Utopia. Technology, Green Series. 10,(2011).
Next to nothing: A Study of Scientists and their Cosmology at a Swedish Research Laboratory. ACTA, Gothenburg studies in Social Anthropology.(2009).