CNS Publications

Found 188 results

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
F
Foladori, G. (2012).  Achieving Equitable Outcomes Through Emerging Technologies: A Social Empowerment Approach. (Parker, Rachel, Appelbaum, Richard, Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 40-46.
Friedman, S. M., & Egolf B. P. (2012).  Perspective: What have the Mass Media been Reporting on Nanotechnology Risks?. (Susanna Hornig Priest, Ed.).Nanotechnology and the Public: Risk Perception and Risk Communication. 157-165.
Friedman, S. M., & Egolf B. P. (2011).  A Longitudinal Study of Newspaper and Wire Service Coverage of Nanotechnology Risks. Risk Analysis. 31, 1701-1717.
G
Godwin, H. A., Chopra K., Bradley K., Cohen Y., Harthorn B. H., Hoek E. M. V., et al. (2009).  The University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology. Environmental Science and Technology. 43, 6453-6457.
H
Harthorn, B. H. (2010).  Amplification of Risk. Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology. 669-670.
Harthorn, B. H. (2009).  Reflections from Dr Barbara Herr Harhorn. A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. pg 43.
Harthorn, B., Shearer C., & Rogers J. (2011).  Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in US Nanotech Deliberations. (Torben Zuelsdorf, Ed.).Quantum Engagements—Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies.
Harthorn, B. H., McCray P. W., & Satterfield T. (2006).  Anthropological research at the UCSB Center for Nanotechnology in Society. Practicing Anthropology. 28, 38-40.
Harthorn, B. H. (2010).  Attenuation of Risk. <i>Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology</i>. 671-672.
Harthorn, B. H. (2010).  Public participation in nanotechnology – should we care? . 2020 Science .
Harthorn, B., Shearer C., & Rogers J. (2012).  Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies. (Parker, Rachel, Appelbaum, Richard, Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 188-197.
Harthorn, B. H., Pidgeon N., & Satterfield T. (2009).  Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. AZoM.com.
Harthorn, B. H. (2011).  Methodological Challenges Posed by Emergent Nanotechnologies and Cultural Values. (Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber, Ed.).The Handbook of Emergent Technologies and Social Research.
Harthorn, B. H. (2010).  Gender and Nanotechnology. Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology. 269-271.
Harthorn, B. H. (2006).  Nano-buzz: Social Dimensions of Emerging Technologies. Anthropology News. 47, 26.
Harthorn, B., Rogers J., Shearer C., & Martin T. (2012).  Debating Nanoethics: U.S. Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology Applications for Energy and the Environment. (Dane Scott, Blake Francis, Ed.).Debating Science: Deliberation, Values, and the Common Good. 227-249.
Harthorn, B. H., Rogers J., & Shearer C. (2010).  Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper]. Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting.
Harthorn, B. H., Bryant K., & Rogers J. (2009).  Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US. University of Washington Center for Workforce Development.
Hegde, D., & Mowery D. C. (2008).  Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system. Science. 322, 1797-1798.
Herron, P., & Lenoir T. (2009).  Tracking the Current Rise of Chinese Pharmaceutical Bionanotechnology. Journal of Biomedical Discovery and Innovation. 4, 38.
I
Invernizzi, N. (2012).  Implications of Nanotechnology for Labor and Employment: Assessing Nanotechnology Products in Brazil. (Parker, Rachel, Appelbaum, Richard, Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 140-152.
J
Jae-Young, C., Ramachandra G., & Kandlikar M. (2009).  The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation. Environmental Science and Technology. 43, 3030-3034.
Johansson, M. (2010).  Vi är dina provexemplar - om etnografiskt fältarbete i laboratoriemiljö (We are your samples - On ethnographic fieldwork in laboratory environments). (J. Bärmark, Ed.).Att tänka genom kulturer (To think through cultures).
Johansson, M. (2011).  Technological Utopia. Technology, Green Series. 10,
Johansson, M. (2009).  Next to nothing: A Study of Scientists and their Cosmology at a Swedish Research Laboratory. ACTA, Gothenburg studies in Social Anthropology.