CNS Publications Library


  • Pidgeon, N., Harthorn B. H., Bryant K., & Rogers-Hayden T. (2009). Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology, (4)(2), (pp. 95-98). Retrieved from
    doi: 10.1038/nnano.2008.362
  • Pidgeon, N. (2009). Reflections from Prof Nick Pidgeon. A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties, (pp. 32). Retrieved from
  • Satterfield, T. A., Kandlikar M., Beaudrie C., Conti J. A., & Harthorn B. H. (2009). Anticipating the Perceived Risk of Nanotechnologies: Will They Be Like Other Controversial Nanotechnologies. Nature Nanotechnology, (4), (pp. 752-758).
  • Weaver, D. A., Lively E., & Bimber B. (2009). Searching for a Frame: Media Tell the Story of Technological Progress, Risk, and Regulation in the Case of Nanotechnology. Science Communication, (31)(2), (pp. 139-166).


  • Appelbaum, R. P., & Parker R. (2008). China's Bid to be the Global Nanotech Leader: Advancing Nanotechnology Through State-Led Programs and International Collaborations. Science and Public Policy, (35)(5), (pp. 319-334).
  • Choi, H. (2008). Setting an Agenda for the Social Studies of Nanotechnology [white paper]. Symposium on the Social Studies of Nanotechnology. Wharton School:.
  • Choi, H. (2008, April 22). Maddin, Robert Oral History Interview. Philadelphia, PA: Chemical Heritage Foundation.
  • Conti, J. A., Killpack K., Gerritzen G., Huang L., Mircheva M., Delmas M., et al. (2008). Health and Safety Practices in the Nanotechnology Workplace: Results From an International Survey. Environmental Science and Technology, (42)(9), (pp. 3155-3262). Retrieved from
  • Hegde, D., & Mowery D. C. (2008). Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system. Science, (322)(5909), (pp. 1797-1798). doi: 10.1126/science.1158562
  • Lenoir, T., & Gianella E. (2008). Technological Platforms and the Layers of Patent Data. In Gianella, E., Biagioli M., Jaszi P., & Woodmansee M. (Eds.),. Con/Texts of Invention: Creative Production in Legal and Cultural Perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Macher, J. T., & Mowery D. C. (2008). Introduction: Running Faster to Keep Up. Running Faster to Keep Up: Globalization of R&D and U.S Economic Welfare National Academies Press.
  • McCarty, P., Lively E., Weaver D., Mohr J., & Bimber B. (2008). The Role of Governmental and Non-Governmental Institutions in Framing Nanotechnology as a Social Issue. Santa Barbara, CA:.
  • McCray, P. W. (2008). It’s Just Like That, Except Different. The Power of Analogy In Describing Nanotechnology. Science Progress. Retrieved from
  • Mody, C. (2008). Scientific Training and the Creation of Scientific Knowledge. In Hackett, E. J., Amsterdamska O., Lynch M., & Wajcman J. (Eds.),. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, (pp. 377-402). Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Mody, C. (2008). How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, the Nuclear Reactor, the Computer, Ham Radio, and Recombinant DNA. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences, (38)(3), (pp. 451-461).
  • Mody, C. (2008). The Larger World of Nano. Physics Today, (61)(10), (pp. 38-44).
  • Neuman, D., Ostrowski A. D., Mikhailovsky A. A., Absalonson R. O., Strouse G. F., & Ford P. C. (2008). Quantum Dot Fluorescence Quenching Pathways with Cr(III) Complexes. Photosensitized NO Production from trans-Cr(cyclam)(ONO)2+. Journal of the American Chemical Society, (130), (pp. 168-175).
  • Newfield, C. (2008). Unmaking the Public University: The 40-Year Assault on the Middle Class . Cambridge: Harvard University .
  • Pidgeon, N. (2008). Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement. In Bammer, G., & Smithson M. (Eds.),. Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives, (pp. 349-361). London: Earthscan .
  • Rogers-Hayden, T., & Pidgeon N. (2008). Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Understanding of Science, (16), (pp. 345–364). Retrieved from
  • Rogers-Hayden, T., & Pidgeon N. (2008). Developments in nanotechnology public engagement in the UK: ‘upstream’ towards sustainability?. Journal of Cleaner Production , (16), (pp. 1010-1013). Retrieved from
    doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.04.013
  • Rogers-Hayden, T., & Pidgeon N. (2008). Upstream engagement. Scientific and Public Affairs, (pp. 11).
  • Weaver, D. A., & Bimber B. (2008). Finding news stories: A comparison of searches using LexisNexis and Google News. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, (83)(3), (pp. 515-530). Retrieved from


  • Appelbaum, R. P. (2007). Survey of Participants, NSF-Sponsored US-China Workshop on Nanotechnology, March 22-24, 2006.
  • Erkal, N., & Scotchmer S. (2007). Scarcity of Ideas and Options to Invest in R&D (paper E07-348). Berkeley, CA: Institute of Business and Economic Research. Retrieved from