CNS Publications

Found 188 results

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
S
Eisler, M. N. (2010).  Spintronics. Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. 735-736.
Mody, C. (2007).  Some Thoughts on Why History Matters in Understanding the Social Issues of Nanotechnology and Other Converging Technologies. Nanoethics.
Foladori, G., & Invernizzi N. (2012).  Social and Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology Development in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Choi, H. (2008).  Setting an Agenda for the Social Studies of Nanotechnology [white paper]. Symposium on the Social Studies of Nanotechnology.
Eisler, M. N. (2010).  Self-Assembly. Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. 709-710.
Weaver, D. A., Lively E., & Bimber B. (2009).  Searching for a Frame: Media Tell the Story of Technological Progress, Risk, and Regulation in the Case of Nanotechnology. Science Communication. 31, 139-166.
Mody, C. C. M. (2008).  Scientific Training and the Creation of Scientific Knowledge. (Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, Judy Wajcman, Ed.).Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 377-402.
Parker, R. (2010).  Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: High-tech Industry Growth in China. Department of Sociology .
Eisler, M. N. (2010).  Science Policy. Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. 702-704.
Newfield, C. (2010).  Science out of the Shadows: Public Nanotechnology and Social Welfare. Occasion: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities. 2, 1-19.
Erkal, N., & Scotchmer S. (2007).  Scarcity of Ideas and Options to Invest in R&D (paper E07-348).
Mody, C. C. M. (2010).  Scanning Tunneling Microscopy. (D. Guston, J. G. Golson, Ed.).Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology and Society.
R
and Pidgeon, N. B. F. (2011).  The Role of Social and Decision Sciences in Communicating Uncertain Climate Risks. Nature Climate Change. 1,
McCarty, P., Lively E., Weaver D., Mohr J., & Bimber B. (2008).  The Role of Governmental and Non-Governmental Institutions in Framing Nanotechnology as a Social Issue.
Newfield, C. (2009).  Risky Business: Why Public Is Losing to Private in American Research. Polygraph. 21, 77-95.
Harthorn, B. H., Pidgeon N., & Satterfield T. (2009).  Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. AZoM.com.
Pidgeon, N. (2008).  Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement. (Gabriele Bammer, Michael Smithson, Ed.).Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives. 349-361.
Harthorn, B., Shearer C., & Rogers J. (2012).  Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies. (Parker, Rachel, Appelbaum, Richard, Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 188-197.
Pidgeon, N. (2006).  Risk and uncertainty. Trust in science: The Dialogue With Society. 40-45.
Newfield, C. (2010).  Review of Steve Shapin, The scientific life: A moral history of a late modern vocation. Technology and Culture. 51, 1058-1060.
Mody, C. C. M. (2011).  Review of Nanoethics: Big Ethical Issues with Small Technology by Dónal P. O’Mathúna. Technology and Culture. 52, 49-51.
Pidgeon, N. (2009).  Reflections from Prof Nick Pidgeon. A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. pg 32.
Harthorn, B. H. (2009).  Reflections from Dr Barbara Herr Harhorn. A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. pg 43.
Rogers-Hayden, T., & Pidgeon N. (2006).  Reflecting Upon the UK's citizens' Jury on Nanotechnologies: Nano Jury UK. Nanotechnology Law and Business. 2, 167-178.
Barnett, G. (2011).  Recombinant Innovation. Review of Genentech The Beginnings of Biotech by Sally Smith. Science Progress. 334,