CNS Publications

Found 188 results

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 
2009
Murr, M. M., Patterson S. E., Hu E. L., Goodchild F. M., & McCray P. W. (2009).  From the Ground Up: Developing an Interdisciplinary Course Focusing on Materials Science and Society in Green Technologies. Journal of Materials Education. 31, 251-264.
2012
Negoita, M., & Block F. (2012).  Networks and Public Policies in the Global South: The Chilean Case and the Future of the Developmental Network State. Studies in Comparative International Development . 47, 1-22.
2007
Neuman, D., Ostrowski A. D., Absalonson R. O., Strouse G. F., & Ford P. C. (2007).  Photosensitized NO Release from Water-Soluble Nanoparticle Assemblies. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 129, 2.
2008
Neuman, D., Ostrowski A. D., Mikhailovsky A. A., Absalonson R. O., Strouse G. F., & Ford P. C. (2008).  Quantum Dot Fluorescence Quenching Pathways with Cr(III) Complexes. Photosensitized NO Production from trans-Cr(cyclam)(ONO)2+. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 130, 168-175.
2006
Newfield, C. (2006).  Nano-Punk for Tomorrow's People (commentary). Tomorrow's People Conference .
2007
Newfield, C. (2007).  Passé et passif de l'enseignement supérieur américain. Le Monde Diplomatique. 6-7.
2008
Newfield, C. (2008).  Unmaking the Public University: The 40-Year Assault on the Middle Class .
2009
Newfield, C. (2009).  Risky Business: Why Public Is Losing to Private in American Research. Polygraph. 21, 77-95.
Newfield, C. (2009).  Structure et silence du cognitariat. Multitudes. 39, 69-78.
Newfield, C. (2009).  L'Université et la revanche des 'élites' aux États-Unis. La Revue Internationale Des Livres & Des Idées. 28-29.
Newfield, C. (2009).  Fixing the Developmental University: The Case of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. (Fred Block, Matt Keller, Ed.).State of Innovation: US Federal Technology Policies, 1969-2008.
2010
Newfield, C. (2010).  Science out of the Shadows: Public Nanotechnology and Social Welfare. Occasion: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities. 2, 1-19.
Newfield, C. (2010).  Avoiding Network Failure: The Case of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. (Fred Block, Matt Keller, Ed.).State of Innovation: The U.S. Government's Role in Technology Development.
Newfield, C. (2010).  Is the Corporation a Social Partner? The Case of Nanotechnology. (Purnima Bose, Laura E. Lyons, Ed.).Cultural critique and the global corporation. 215-224.
Newfield, C. (2010).  Review of Steve Shapin, The scientific life: A moral history of a late modern vocation. Technology and Culture. 51, 1058-1060.
2011
Newfield, C. (2011).  Was the Innovation Economy Killed by the Debt Debate?. The Blog.
2009
Newfield, C., Alimahomed K., Macala J., & Stoltzfus K. (2009).  Is nanotechnology Changing Scientific Collaboration? Survey Evidence from a Nano-Oriented Campus. Nature Nanotechnology.
2010
Newfield, C., & Barnett G. (2010).  The Federal Stimulus Should Support Research at Public Universities. Chronicle of Higher Education.
2009
Ostrowski, A. D., Martin T., Conti J. A., Hurt I., & Harthorn B. H. (2009).  Nanotoxicology: Characterizing the Scientific Literature: 2000-2007. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 11, 251-257.
2010
Parker, R. (2010).  Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: High-tech Industry Growth in China. Department of Sociology .
2012
Parker, R., & Appelbaum R. (2012).  Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?.
2010
Parker, R., & Appelbaum R. P. (2010).  Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Water Filtration Systems: From New Material Innovation to New Product Innovation. New Materials Innovation.
2009
Parker, R., Ridge C., Cao C., & Appelbaum R. P. (2009).  China’s Nanotechnology Patent Landscape: An Analysis of Invention Patents Filed with the State Intellectual Property Office. Nanotechnology Law and Business. 6, 524-539.
2006
Pidgeon, N. (2006).  Opportunities and Uncertainties: The British Nanotechnologies Report and the Case for Upstream Societal Dialogue. (K. Andersson, Ed.).Proceedings of VALDOR K. 371-378.
Pidgeon, N. (2006).  Risk and uncertainty. Trust in science: The Dialogue With Society. 40-45.