CNS Publications Library


  • Becker, S. (2013). Nanotechnology in the marketplace: how the nanotechnology industry views risk. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, (15)(1426), (pp. 1-13). doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-1426-7
  • Cao, C., Appelbaum R. P., & Parker R. (2013). Research is High and the Market is Far Away - Commercialization of Nanotechnology in China. Technology in Society, (35), (pp. 55-64).
  • Cherry, C., Hopfe C., MacGillivray B., & Pidgeon N. (2013). Media discourses of low carbon housing: The marginalisation of social and behvioural dimensions within the British broadsheet press. Public Understanding of Science. Retrieved from
    doi: 10.1177/0963662513512442
  • Collins, M., & Freudenburg W. (2013). Temporal Myopia: A Case of Promising New Technologies, the Federal Government, and Inherent Conflicts of Interest. In Maret, S. (Eds.),. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, (pp. 259-276). Bingly, England: Emerald.
  • Copeland, L. (2013). Value Change and Political Action: Postmaterialism, Environmentalism, and Political Consumerism. American Politics Research. doi: 10.1177/153267X13494235
  • Copeland, L. (2013). Conceptualizing Political Consumerism: How Citizenship Norms Shape Boycotting and Buycotting. Political Studies. doi: 10.1111/1467-9284.12067
  • Corner, A. (2013). Geoengineering & Green Thought. Political Science Hosted by the Guardian The Guardian. Retrieved from
  • Corner, A., Parkhill K., & Vaughan N. (2013). Messing with Nature: Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change, (23)(5), (pp. 938-947). Retrieved from
    doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.002
  • Eisler, M. N. (2013). "The Ennobling Unity of Science and Technology": Materials Sciences and Engineering, the Department of Energy, and the Nanotechnology Enigma. Minerva. doi: 10.1007/s11024-013-9224-z
  • Engeman, C., Baumgartner L., Carr B., Fish A., Meyerhofer J., Satterfield T. A., et al. (2013). The hierarchy of environmental, health, and safety practices, in the US nanotechnology workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, (10)(9), (pp. 487-495). doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.818231
  • Henderson, J., Appelbaum R. P., & Ho S. Y. (2013). Globalization With Chinese Characteristics: Externalizations, Dynamics, and Transformations. Development and Change: Special Issue on Globalization With Chinese Characteristics, (44)(6), (pp. 1221-1253). doi: 10.1111/dech.12066
  • Kay, L., Youtie J., & Shapira P. (2013). Signs of Things to Come? What Patent Submissions by Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Say About Corporate Strategies in Emerging Technologies. Technology Forecasting and Social Change. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.09.006
  • Kay, L., & Youtie J. (2013). Corporate Strategies in Emerging Technologies: The Case of Chinese Firms and Energy Storage-Related Nanotechnology Applications. In Konrad, K., Coenen C., Dijkstra A., Milburn C., & van Lente H. (Eds.),. Shaping Emerging Technologies: Governance, Innovation, Discourse. Berlin, Germany: IOS Press / AKA.
  • Lau, E. Z. (2013). La inserción de la nanotecnología en el desarrollo. Observatorio del Desarrollo, (2)(6).
  • Lau, E. Z. (2013). The Social Relevance of Nanotechnology in Mexico. Sociologia y tecnociencia/Sociology and Technoscience.
  • McCray, P. W. (2013). The Visioneers: How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies, and a Limitless Future, Histories of Our Technological Future: How Space Colonies, Nanotechnology, and Transhumanism Challenged the Idea of Limits. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Mody, C., & Nelson A. J. (2013). ‘A Towering Virtue of Necessity’: Computer Music at Vietnam-Era Stanford. Osiris, (28), (pp. 254-277).
  • Mody, C., & Choi H. (2013). From Material Science to Nanotechnology: Institutions, Communities, and Disciplines at Cornell University, 1960-2000. Historical Studies in Natural Sciences, (43)(2), (pp. 121-161).
  • Mody, C. (2013). Santa Barbara, Physics, and the Long 1970s. Physics Today, (66)(9), (pp. 31-37).
  • Mody, C. (2013). Limits Be Damned: Review of How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies, and a Limitless Future. Nature, (493), (pp. 24-25).
  • Novak, D. (2013). Performing Antinuclear Movements in Post-3.11 Japan. STS Forum on the 2011 Fukushima/ East Japan Disaster. STS Forum on Fukushima:. Retrieved from
  • Novak, D. (2013). The Sounds of Japan's Antinuclear Movement. Post. Retrieved from
  • Parkhill, K., Pidgeon N., Corner A., & Vaughan N. (2013). Deliberation and responsible innovation: a geoengineering case study. In Owen, R., Bessant J., & Heintz M. (Eds.),. Responsible Innovation, (pp. 219-240). London: Wiley.
  • Parkhill, K., Demski C., Butler C., Spence A., & Pidgeon N. (2013). Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability: Synthesis Report, (pp. 1-48). UKERC: London.
  • Pidgeon, N., Parkhill K., Corner A., & Vaughan N. (2013). Deliberating Stratospheric Aerosols for Climate Geoengineering and the SPICE Project. Nature Climate Change, (3)(5), (pp. 451-457). doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1807