- News + Media
Health and Safety Practices in the Nanotechnology Workplace: Results From an International Survey. Environmental Science and Technology. 42, 3155-3262.(2008).
Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent US Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions . Risk Analysis . 31, 1734–1748.(2011).
Nanotechnologies Risk Perception and Communication (Special Collection). Risk Analysis. 31, 1649-1783.(2011).
Value Change and Political Action: Postmaterialism, Environmentalism, and Political Consumerism. American Politics Research.(2013).
Political Consumerism: Citizen Activism in Response to Climate Change and other Environmental Problems. ( , Ed.).Climate Change Policy and the Role of Society.(Forthcoming).
Messing with Nature: Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change.(2013).
Geoengineering the Climate: The Social and Ethical Implications. Environment. 52, 24-37.(2010).
Nanotechnologies and Upstream Public Engagement: Dilemmas, Debates and Prospects?. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 247-283.(2012).
Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 14, 1-12.(2012).
The hierarchy of environmental, health, and safety practices, in the US nanotechnology workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 10, 487-495.(2013).
Public Responses to Nanotechnology: Risks to the Social Fabric?. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 241-264.(2012).
A Longitudinal Study of Newspaper and Wire Service Coverage of Nanotechnology Risks. Risk Analysis. 31, 1701-1717.(2011).
Perspective: What have the Mass Media been Reporting on Nanotechnology Risks?. ( , Ed.).Nanotechnology and the Public: Risk Perception and Risk Communication. 157-165.(2012).
The University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology. Environmental Science and Technology. 43, 6453-6457.(2009).
Nano-buzz: Social Dimensions of Emerging Technologies. Anthropology News. 47, 26.(2006).
Reflections from Dr. Barbara Herr Harthorn. A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. 43.(2009).
Public participation in nanotechnology – should we care?. 2020 Science .(2010).
Gender and Nanotechnology. ( , Ed.).Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. 269-271.(2010).
Amplification of Risk. ( , Ed.).Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. 669-670.(2010).
Attenuation of Risk. ( , Ed.).<i>Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society</i>. 671-672.(2010).
Methodological Challenges Posed by Emergent Nanotechnologies and Cultural Values. ( , Ed.).The Handbook of Emergent Technologies and Social Research.(2011).
Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US. University of Washington Center for Workforce Development.(2009).
Anthropological research at the UCSB Center for Nanotechnology in Society. Practicing Anthropology. 28, 38-40.(2006).