- News + Media
Filters: Author is Terre Satterfield [Clear All Filters]
Anthropological research at the UCSB Center for Nanotechnology in Society. Practicing Anthropology. 28, 38-40.(2006).
Anticipating the Perceived Risk of Nanotechnologies: Will They Be Like Other Controversial Nanotechnologies. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 752-758.(2009).
From Cradle-to-Grave at the Nanoscale: Gaps in US Regulatory Oversight along the Nanomaterial Life Cycle. Environmental Science & Technology. 47, 5524-5534.(2013).
Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 14, 1-12.(2012).
The hierarchy of environmental, health, and safety practices, in the US nanotechnology workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 10, 487-495.(2013).
"Nanomaterial Risks Expert Workshop Summary". CNS Report.(Forthcoming).
Nanotech: Good or Bad?. The Chemical Engineer. 37-39.(2010).
Nanotechnologies Risk Perception and Communication (Special Collection). Risk Analysis. 31, 1649-1783.(2011).
Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue). 31, 1694–1700.(2011).
Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. AZoM.com.(2009).
Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent US Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions . Risk Analysis . 31, 1734–1748.(2011).