- News + Media
Filters: Author is Harthorn, Barbara Herr [Clear All Filters]
Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development. ( , Ed.).Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020. 561-618.(2011).
Methodological Challenges Posed by Emergent Nanotechnologies and Cultural Values. ( , Ed.).The Handbook of Emergent Technologies and Social Research.(2011).
Conference Papers and Proceedings
Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper]. Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting.(2010).
Anthropological research at the UCSB Center for Nanotechnology in Society. Practicing Anthropology. 28, 38-40.(2006).
Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 95-98.(2009).
From Biotech to Nanotech: Public Debates about Technological Modification of Food. Environment and Society: Advances in Research. 2, 149-169.(2011).
Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 14, 1-12.(2012).
Health and Safety Practices in the Nanotechnology Workplace: Results From an International Survey. Environmental Science and Technology. 42, 3155-3262.(2008).
Nanotoxicology: Characterizing the Scientific Literature: 2000-2007. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 11, 251-257.(2009).
The University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology. Environmental Science and Technology. 43, 6453-6457.(2009).
Nano-buzz: Social Dimensions of Emerging Technologies. Anthropology News. 47, 26.(2006).
Public participation in nanotechnology – should we care? . 2020 Science .(2010).
Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. AZoM.com.(2009).