- News + Media
Filters: Author is Harthorn, Barbara Herr [Clear All Filters]
Working for Next to Nothing - Labor in the Global Nanoscientific Community. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 88-110.(2012).
When Space Travel and Nanotechnology Met at the Fountains of Paradise. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 37-51.(2012).
Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent US Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions . Risk Analysis . 31, 1734–1748.(2011).
The University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology. Environmental Science and Technology. 43, 6453-6457.(2009).
Science that Pays for Itself: Nanotechnology and the Discourse of Science Policy Reform. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 19-36.(2012).
Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. AZoM.com.(2009).
Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 188-197.(2012).
Reflections from Dr. Barbara Herr Harthorn. A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. 43.(2009).
Public Responses to Nanotechnology: Risks to the Social Fabric?. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 241-264.(2012).
Public participation in nanotechnology – should we care?. 2020 Science .(2010).
News Media Frame Novel Technologies in a Familiar Way: Nanotechnology, Applications, and Progress. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 223-240.(2012).
Nanotoxicology: Characterizing the Scientific Literature: 2000-2007. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 11, 251-257.(2009).
Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue). 31, 1694–1700.(2011).
Nanotechnology as Industrial Policy: China and the United States. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 111-133.(2012).
Nanotechnologies Risk Perception and Communication (Special Collection). Risk Analysis. 31, 1649-1783.(2011).
Nanotechnologies and Upstream Public Engagement: Dilemmas, Debates and Prospects?. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 247-283.(2012).
Nanotech: Good or Bad?. The Chemical Engineer. 37-39.(2010).
Nano-buzz: Social Dimensions of Emerging Technologies. Anthropology News. 47, 26.(2006).
Methodological Challenges Posed by Emergent Nanotechnologies and Cultural Values. ( , Ed.).The Handbook of Emergent Technologies and Social Research.(2011).
Is Nanoscale Collaboration Meeting Nanotechnology’s Social Challenge? A Call for Nano-Normalcy. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 69-87.(2012).
Introduction: The Social Scientific View of Nanotechnologies. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 1-15.(2012).
Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development. ( , Ed.).Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020. 561-618.(2011).