- News + Media
Filters: Author is Harthorn, Barbara Herr [Clear All Filters]
Amplification of Risk. ( , Ed.).Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. 669-670.(2010).
Anthropological research at the UCSB Center for Nanotechnology in Society. Practicing Anthropology. 28, 38-40.(2006).
Anticipating the Perceived Risk of Nanotechnologies: Will They Be Like Other Controversial Nanotechnologies. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 752-758.(2009).
Attenuation of Risk. ( , Ed.).<i>Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society</i>. 671-672.(2010).
The Chinese Century? Some Implications of China’s Move to High-Tech Innovation for U.S. Policy. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 134-165.(2012).
Conferences and the Emergence of Nanoscience. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 52-65.(2012).
Debating Nanoethics: U.S. Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology Applications for Energy and the Environment. ( , Ed.).Debating Science: Deliberation, Values, and the Common Good. 227-249.(2012).
Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 95-98.(2009).
Different Uses, Different Responses: Exploring Emergent Cultural Values through Public Deliberation. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 195-222.(2012).
Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in US Nanotech Deliberations. ( , Ed.).Quantum Engagements: Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. 75-89.(2011).
From Biotech to Nanotech: Public Debates about Technological Modification of Food. Environment and Society: Advances in Research. 2, 149-169.(2011).
Gender and Nanotechnology. ( , Ed.).Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. 269-271.(2010).
Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper]. Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting.(2010).
Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US. University of Washington Center for Workforce Development.(2009).
Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 14, 1-12.(2012).
Health and Safety Practices in the Nanotechnology Workplace: Results From an International Survey. Environmental Science and Technology. 42, 3155-3262.(2008).
The hierarchy of environmental, health, and safety practices, in the US nanotechnology workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 10, 487-495.(2013).
Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development. ( , Ed.).Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020. 561-618.(2011).
Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development. Journal of Nanoparticle Research . 13, 3557-3590.(2011).
Introduction: The Social Scientific View of Nanotechnologies. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 1-15.(2012).
Is Nanoscale Collaboration Meeting Nanotechnology’s Social Challenge? A Call for Nano-Normalcy. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 69-87.(2012).
Methodological Challenges Posed by Emergent Nanotechnologies and Cultural Values. ( , Ed.).The Handbook of Emergent Technologies and Social Research.(2011).
Nano-buzz: Social Dimensions of Emerging Technologies. Anthropology News. 47, 26.(2006).