- News + Media
Filters: Author is Harthorn, Barbara Herr [Clear All Filters]
Nanotechnology as Industrial Policy: China and the United States. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 111-133.(2012).
Health and Safety Practices in the Nanotechnology Workplace: Results From an International Survey. Environmental Science and Technology. 42, 3155-3262.(2008).
Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent US Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions . Risk Analysis . 31, 1734–1748.(2011).
Nanotechnologies and Upstream Public Engagement: Dilemmas, Debates and Prospects?. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 247-283.(2012).
Science that Pays for Itself: Nanotechnology and the Discourse of Science Policy Reform. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 19-36.(2012).
The hierarchy of environmental, health, and safety practices, in the US nanotechnology workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 10, 487-495.(2013).
Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 14, 1-12.(2012).
Public Responses to Nanotechnology: Risks to the Social Fabric?. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 241-264.(2012).
The University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology. Environmental Science and Technology. 43, 6453-6457.(2009).
Nano-buzz: Social Dimensions of Emerging Technologies. Anthropology News. 47, 26.(2006).
Debating Nanoethics: U.S. Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology Applications for Energy and the Environment. ( , Ed.).Debating Science: Deliberation, Values, and the Common Good. 227-249.(2012).
Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US. University of Washington Center for Workforce Development.(2009).
Amplification of Risk. ( , Ed.).Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. 669-670.(2010).
Reflections from Dr. Barbara Herr Harthorn. A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. 43.(2009).
Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in US Nanotech Deliberations. ( , Ed.).Quantum Engagements: Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. 75-89.(2011).
Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. AZoM.com.(2009).
Anthropological research at the UCSB Center for Nanotechnology in Society. Practicing Anthropology. 28, 38-40.(2006).
Attenuation of Risk. ( , Ed.).<i>Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society</i>. 671-672.(2010).
Public participation in nanotechnology – should we care?. 2020 Science .(2010).
Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 188-197.(2012).
Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper]. Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting.(2010).
Introduction: The Social Scientific View of Nanotechnologies. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 1-15.(2012).
Methodological Challenges Posed by Emergent Nanotechnologies and Cultural Values. ( , Ed.).The Handbook of Emergent Technologies and Social Research.(2011).
Gender and Nanotechnology. ( , Ed.).Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. 269-271.(2010).