CNS Publications Library

2013

  • Corner, A. (2013). Geoengineering & Green Thought. Political Science Hosted by the Guardian The Guardian. Retrieved from
    http://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2013/jul/29/messing-nature-geoengineering-green-thought
  • Corner, A., Parkhill K., & Vaughan N. (2013). Messing with Nature: Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change, (23)(5), (pp. 938-947). Retrieved from
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.002
    doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.002
  • Eisler, M. N. (2013). "The Ennobling Unity of Science and Technology": Materials Sciences and Engineering, the Department of Energy, and the Nanotechnology Enigma. Minerva. doi: 10.1007/s11024-013-9224-z
  • Engeman, C., Baumgartner L., Carr B., Fish A., Meyerhofer J., Satterfield T. A., et al. (2013). The hierarchy of environmental, health, and safety practices, in the US nanotechnology workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene., (10)(9), (pp. 487-495). doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.818231
  • Fadel, T., Morita S., & Mayfield M. (2013). Stakeholder Perspectives on Perception, Assessment, and Management of the Potential Risks of Nanotechnology. In Panter, M., Johnson P., & Holdridge G. (Eds.),, (pp. 74). Arlington: National nanotechnology Coordination Office.
  • Kay, L., & Youtie J. (2013). Corporate Strategies in Emerging Technologies: The Case of Chinese Firms and Energy Storage-Related Nanotechnology Applications. In Konrad, K., Coenen C., Dijkstra A., Milburn C., & van Lente H. (Eds.),. Shaping Emerging Technologies: Governance, Innovation, Discourse. Berlin, Germany: IOS Press / AKA.
  • Lau, E. Z. (2013). La nanotecnología y su inserción en el desarrollo. Observatorio del Desarrollo, (2)(6), (pp. 37-43).
  • Lau, E. Z. (2013). The Social Relevance of Nanotechnology in Mexico. Sociologia y tecnociencia/Sociology and Technoscience.
  • McCray, P. W. (2013). The Visioneers: How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies, and a Limitless Future, Histories of Our Technological Future: How Space Colonies, Nanotechnology, and Transhumanism Challenged the Idea of Limits. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Mody, C., & Nelson A. J. (2013). ‘A Towering Virtue of Necessity’: Computer Music at Vietnam-Era Stanford. Osiris, (28), (pp. 254-277).
  • Mody, C., & Choi H. (2013). From Material Science to Nanotechnology: Institutions, Communities, and Disciplines at Cornell University, 1960-2000. Historical Studies in Natural Sciences, (43)(2), (pp. 121-161).
  • Mody, C. (2013). Santa Barbara, Physics, and the Long 1970s. Physics Today, (66)(9), (pp. 31-37).
  • Mody, C. (2013). Limits Be Damned: Review of How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies, and a Limitless Future. Nature, (493), (pp. 24-25).
  • Novak, D. (2013). Performing Antinuclear Movements In Post-3.11 Japan. STS Forum on the 2011 Fukushima/ East Japan Disaster. STS Forum on Fukushima:. Retrieved from
    http://fukushimaforum.wordpress.com/online-forum-2/second-3-11-virtual-conference-2013/performing-antinuclear-movements-in-post-3-11-japan/
  • Novak, D. (2013). The Sounds of Japan's Antinuclear Movement. Post. Retrieved from
    http://post.at.moma.org/content_items/251-podcast-the-sounds-of-japan-s-antinuclear-movement
  • Parkhill, K., Pidgeon N., Corner A., & Vaughan N. (2013). Deliberation and responsible innovation: a geoengineering case study. In Owen, R., Bessant J., & Heintz M. (Eds.),. Responsible Innovation, (pp. 219-240). London: Wiley.
  • Parkhill, K., Demski C., Butler C., Spence A., & Pidgeon N. (2013). Transforming the UK Energy System: Public Values, Attitudes and Acceptability: Synthesis Report, (pp. 1-48). UKERC: London.
  • Pidgeon, N., Parkhill K., Corner A., & Vaughan N. (2013). Deliberating Stratospheric Aerosols for Climate Geoengineering and the SPICE Project. Nature Climate Change, (3)(5), (pp. 451-457). doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1807
  • Rayner, S., Clare H., Kruger T., Pidgeon N., Redgwell C., & Savulescu J. (2013). The Oxford Principles. Climactic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0675-2
  • Satterfield, T. A., Conti J., Harthorn B. H., Pidgeon N., & Pitts A. (2013). Understanding shifting perceptions of nanotechnologies and their implications for policy dialogues about emerging technologies. Science and Public Policy, (40)(2), (pp. 247-260). doi: 10.1093/scippol/scs084

2012

  • Appelbaum, R. P., & Parker R. (2012). China’s Move to High Tech Innovation. In Dent, C., & Dosch J. (Eds.),. The Asia-Pacific, Regionalism And The Global System, (pp. 201-215). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Appelbaum, R. P., Cao C., Parker R., & Motoyama Y. (2012). Nanotechnology as Industrial Policy: China and the United States. In Harthorn, B. H., & Mohr J. W. (Eds.),. The Social Life of Nanotechnology, (pp. 111-133). New York: Routledge.
  • Choi, H., & Otani T. (2012). Failure to Launch: Tarui Yasuo, the Quadrupole Transistor, and the Meanings of the IC in Postwar Japan. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, (34)(1), (pp. 48-59). Retrieved from
    http://www.computer.org/csdl/mags/an/2012/01/man2012010048-abs.html
    doi: 10.1109/MAHC.2011.86
  • Corner, A., Pidgeon N., & Parkhill K. (2012). Perceptions of geoengineering: Public attitudes, stakeholder perspectives & the challenge of ‘upstream’ engagement. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews (WIRES) Climate Change. doi: 10.1002/wcc.176
  • Corner, A., & Pidgeon N. (2012). Nanotechnologies and Upstream Public Engagement: Dilemmas, Debates and Prospects?. In Harthorn, B. H., & Mohr J. (Eds.),. The Social Life of Nanotechnology, (pp. 247-283). New York: Routledge.