CNS Publications Library

2011

  • Appelbaum, R. P., Parker R., Cao C., & Gereffi G. (2011). China's (Not So Hidden) Developmental State: Becoming a Leading Nanotechnology Innovator in the Twenty-first Century. In Block, F., & Keller M. R. (Eds.),. State of Innovation: The U.S. Government's Role in Technology Development, (pp. 217-235). Boulder, CO : Paradigm Press.
  • Barnett, G. (2011). Recombinant Innovation. Review of Genentech The Beginnings of Biotech by Sally Smith. Science , (334)(6062), (pp. 1497-1497). Retrieved from
    http://www.sciencemag.org/content/334/6062/1497.full?sid=9000960a-fa25-494c-9b1a-301e48948be6
    doi: 10.1126/science.1215785
  • Beaudrie, C., & Kandlikar M. (2011). Horses for Courses: Risk Information and Decision Making in the Regulation of Nanomaterials. Journal of Nanoparticle Research , (Special Focus: Governance of Nanobiotechnology)(DOI 10.1007/s11051-011-0234-1), (pp. 1-12). Retrieved from
    http://www.springerlink.com/content/k45528766006522v/
  • Beaudrie, C., Kandlikar M., & Ramachandran G. (2011). Using Expert Judgment for Risk Assessment. In Ramachandran, G. (Eds.),. Assessing Nanoparticle Risks to Human Health, (pp. 110-138). Maryland Heights, MO: Elsevier. Retrieved from
    http://store.elsevier.com/Assessing-Nanoparticle-Risks-to-Human-Health/Gurumurthy-Ramachandran/isbn-9781437778632/
  • Brock, D. (2011). The Uncertain Future of Moore’s Law - The Rise of 3-D Transistors and What it Means for Technology in the 21st Century. Science Progress, (pp. 1-5). Retrieved from
    http://scienceprogress.org/2011/06/the-uncertain-future-of-moore%E2%80%99s-law/
  • Conti, J. A., Satterfield T. A., & Harthorn B. H. (2011). Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent US Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions . Risk Analysis , (31)(11), (pp. 1734–1748). Retrieved from
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01608.x/full
    doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01608.x
  • Dillemuth, J., Frederick S., Parker R., Gereffi G., & Appelbaum R. P. (2011). Traveling Technologies: Societal Implications of Nanotechnology through the Global Value Chain. Journal of Nano Education, (3)(1-2), (pp. 36-44). Retrieved from
    http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/asp/jne/2011/00000003/F0020001/art00004?token=003612709f39412f415d767025777b494a5f7b7a7b2d2530332948
  • Eisler, M. N. (2011). Energy Innovation at Nanoscale: Case Study of an Emergent Industry. Science Progress, (pp. 1-6). Retrieved from
    http://www.scienceprogress.org/2011/05/innovation-case-study-nanotechnology-and-clean-energy/
  • Foladori, G. (2011). Participación militar estadounidense en la ciencia y tecnología de México. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, (19)(7), (pp. 1-29).
  • Foladori, G. (2011). U.S. Military Involvement in Mexican Science and Technology.. GlobalResearchCA Global Research. Retrieved from
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27476
  • Friedman, S., & Egolf B. (2011). A Longitudinal Study of Newspaper and Wire Service Coverage of Nanotechnology Risks. Risk Analysis, (31)(11), (pp. 1701-1717). Retrieved from
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01690.x/abstract
  • Harthorn, B. H. (2011). Methodological Challenges Posed by Emergent Nanotechnologies and Cultural Values. In Hesse-Biber, S. N. (Eds.),. The Handbook of Emergent Technologies and Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Harthorn, B. H., Shearer C., & Rogers J. (2011). Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in US Nanotech Deliberations. In Zuelsdorf, T. (Eds.),. Quantum Engagements: Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies, (pp. 75-89). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  • Johansson, M. (2011). Technological Utopia. Technology, Green Series, (10).
  • Mody, C. (2011). Instrumental Community: Probe Microscopy and the Path to Nanotechnology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from
    http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=12735
  • Mody, C. (2011). Review of Nanoethics: Big Ethical Issues with Small Technology by Dónal P. O’Mathúna. Technology and Culture, (52), (pp. 49-51).
  • Mody, C. (2011). Climbing the Hill: Seeing (and Not Seeing) Epochal Breaks from Multiple Vantage Points. In Nordmann, A., Radder H., & Schiemann G. (Eds.),. Science Transformed?: Debating Claims of an Epochal Break, (pp. 54-65). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Motoyama, Y., Appelbaum R. P., & Parker R. (2011). The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Federal Support for Science and Technology, or Hidden Industrial Policy?. Technology in Society, (33)(1-2), (pp. 109-118). Retrieved from
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X1100011X
    doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.03.010
  • Motoyama, Y., & Eisler M. N. (2011). Bibliometry and Nanotechnology: A Meta-Analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (78), (pp. 1174-1182). Retrieved from
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162511000655
    doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.013
  • Mowery, D. (2011). Nanotechnology and the US National Innovation System: Continuity and Change. The Journal of Technology Transfer, (pp. 1-15). Retrieved from
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9210-2
    doi: 10.1007/s10961-011-9210-2
  • Mowery, D. C. (2011). Federal Policy and the Development of Semiconductors, Computer Hardware, and Computer software: A policy Model for Climate-Change R&D?. In Henderson, R., & Newell R. G. (Eds.),. Accelerating Energy Innovation: Lesson from Multiple Sectors, (pp. 159 - 188). Cambridge, MA: NBER. Retrieved from
    http://www.nber.org/books/hend09-1
  • Newfield, C. (2011). Was the Innovation Economy Killed by the Debt Debate?. The Hffuington Post. Retrieved from
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christopher-newfield/innovation-economy-debt-debate_b_917151.html
  • Pidgeon, N., & Fischhoff B. (2011). The Role of Social and Decision Sciences in Communicating Uncertain Climate Risks. Nature Climate Change, (1)(1). doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1080
  • Pidgeon, N., Harthorn B. H., & Satterfield T. A. (2011). Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue), (31)(11), (pp. 1694–1700). Retrieved from
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x/full
    doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x
  • Pidgeon, N., Satterfield T. A., & Harthorn B. H. (2011). Nanotechnologies Risk Perception and Communication (Special Collection). Risk Analysis, (31)(11), (pp. 1649-1783). Retrieved from
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x/full
    doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x