CNS Publications Library

2014

  • Shah, S. K., & Mody C. (2014). Creating a Context for Entrepreneurship: Examining How Users' Technological and Organizational Innovations Set the Stage for Entrepreneurial Activity. In Frischmann, B., Madison M., & Strandburg K. (Eds.),. Commons in the Cultural Environment, (pp. 313-339). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Shearer, C., Rogers-Brown J., Bryant K., Cranfill R., & Harthorn B. H. (2014). Power and Vulnerability: Re-contextualizing 'low risk' views of environmental and health hazards. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy.

2013

  • Appelbaum, R. P. (2013). Innovative and Responsible Governance of Converging Technologies. In Roco, M. (Eds.),. Innovative and Responsible Governance of Converging Technologies. OECD Workshop Report on Bridging the Divide Between Policy, Practice and Research on Public Engagement on Nanotechnologies.
  • Beaudrie, C., Kandlikar M., & Satterfield T. A. (2013). "UBC SDM Risk Workshop summary. CNS Report Center for Nanotechnology in Society - UCSB. Retrieved from
    http://www.cns.ucsb.edu/sites/www.cns.ucsb.edu/files/news/Nanotechnology%20Risk%20Screening%20using%20Structured%20Decision%20Making%20Approach.pdf
  • Beaudrie, C., Satterfield T. A., Kandlikar M., & Harthorn B. H. (2013). Expert Views on regulatory preparedness for managing the risks of nanotechnologies. PLOS One. Retrieved from
    http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0080250
    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080250
  • Beaudrie, C., Kandlikar M., & Satterfield T. A. (2013). From Cradle-to-Grave at the Nanoscale: Gaps in US Regulatory Oversight along the Nanomaterial Life Cycle. Environmental Science & Technology, (47)(11), (pp. 5524-5534). doi: 10.1021/es303591x
  • Becker, S. (2013). Nanotechnology in the marketplace: how the nanotechnology industry views risk. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, (15)(1426), (pp. 1-13). doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-1426-7
  • Cao, C., Appelbaum R. P., & Parker R. (2013). Research is High and the Market is Far Away - Commercialization of Nanotechnology in China. Technology in Society, (35), (pp. 55-64).
  • Cherry, C., Hopfe C., MacGillivray B., & Pidgeon N. (2013, Dec 11). Media discourses of low carbon housing: The marginalisation of social and behvioural dimensions within the British broadsheet press. Public Understanding of Science. Retrieved from
    http://pus.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/12/09/0963662513512442
    doi: 10.1177/0963662513512442
  • Copeland, L. (2013). Conceptualizing Political Consumerism: How Citizenship Norms Shape Boycotting and Buycotting. Political Studies. doi: 10.1111/1467-9284.12067
  • Copeland, L. (2013). Value Change and Political Action: Postmaterialism, Environmentalism, and Political Consumerism. American Politics Research. doi: 10.1177/153267X13494235
  • Corner, A. (2013). Geoengineering & Green Thought. Political Science Hosted by the Guardian The Guardian. Retrieved from
    http://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2013/jul/29/messing-nature-geoengineering-green-thought
  • Corner, A., Parkhill K., & Vaughan N. (2013). Messing with Nature: Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change, (23)(5), (pp. 938-947). Retrieved from
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.002
    doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.06.002
  • Eisler, M. N. (2013). "The Ennobling Unity of Science and Technology": Materials Sciences and Engineering, the Department of Energy, and the Nanotechnology Enigma. Minerva. doi: 10.1007/s11024-013-9224-z
  • Engeman, C., Baumgartner L., Carr B., Fish A., Meyerhofer J., Satterfield T. A., et al. (2013). The hierarchy of environmental, health, and safety practices, in the US nanotechnology workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene., (10)(9), (pp. 487-495). doi: 10.1080/15459624.2013.818231
  • Fadel, T., Morita S., & Mayfield M. (2013). Stakeholder Perspectives on Perception, Assessment, and Management of the Potential Risks of Nanotechnology. In Panter, M., Johnson P., & Holdridge G. (Eds.),, (pp. 74). Arlington: National nanotechnology Coordination Office.
  • Kay, L., & Youtie J. (2013). Corporate Strategies in Emerging Technologies: The Case of Chinese Firms and Energy Storage-Related Nanotechnology Applications. In Konrad, K., Coenen C., Dijkstra A., Milburn C., & van Lente H. (Eds.),. Shaping Emerging Technologies: Governance, Innovation, Discourse. Berlin, Germany: IOS Press / AKA.
  • Lau, E. Z. (2013). The Social Relevance of Nanotechnology in Mexico. Sociologia y tecnociencia/Sociology and Technoscience.
  • McCray, P. W. (2013). The Visioneers: How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies, and a Limitless Future, Histories of Our Technological Future: How Space Colonies, Nanotechnology, and Transhumanism Challenged the Idea of Limits. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Mody, C., & Choi H. (2013). From Material Science to Nanotechnology: Institutions, Communities, and Disciplines at Cornell University, 1960-2000. Historical Studies in Natural Sciences, (43)(2), (pp. 121-161).
  • Mody, C., & Nelson A. J. (2013). ‘A Towering Virtue of Necessity’: Computer Music at Vietnam-Era Stanford. Osiris, (28), (pp. 254-277).
  • Mody, C. (2013). Limits Be Damned: Review of How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies, and a Limitless Future. Nature, (493), (pp. 24-25).
  • Mody, C. (2013). Santa Barbara, Physics, and the Long 1970s. Physics Today, (66)(9), (pp. 31-37).
  • Novak, D. (2013). The Sounds of Japan's Antinuclear Movement. Post. Retrieved from
    http://post.at.moma.org/content_items/251-podcast-the-sounds-of-japan-s-antinuclear-movement
  • Novak, D. (2013). Performing Antinuclear Movements In Post-3.11 Japan. STS Forum on the 2011 Fukushima/ East Japan Disaster. STS Forum on Fukushima:. Retrieved from
    http://fukushimaforum.wordpress.com/online-forum-2/second-3-11-virtual-conference-2013/performing-antinuclear-movements-in-post-3-11-japan/