- News + Media
Filters: Author is Nick Pidgeon [Clear All Filters]
Deliberating Stratospheric Aerosols for Climate Geoengineering and the SPICE Project. Nature Climate Change. 3,(2013).
Deliberation and responsible innovation: a geoengineering case study. ( , Ed.).Responsible Innovation. 219-240.(2013).
The Oxford Principles. Climactic Change.(2013).
Opinion: Shale gas and public acceptability. Ingenia. 10-11.(2012).
Exploring early responses to geoengineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (A). 307, 4176-4196.(2012).
Nanotechnologies and Upstream Public Engagement: Dilemmas, Debates and Prospects?. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 247-283.(2012).
A Transatlantic Conversation on Responsible Innovation and Responsible Governance. ( , Ed.).Little by Little: Expansions of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. 169-180.(2012).
Nanotechnologies Risk Perception and Communication (Special Collection). Risk Analysis. 31, 1649-1783.(2011).
Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue). 31, 1694–1700.(2011).
The Role of Social and Decision Sciences in Communicating Uncertain Climate Risks. Nature Climate Change. 1,(2011).
Geoengineering the Climate: The Social and Ethical Implications. Environment. 52, 24-37.(2010).
Nanotech: Good or Bad?. The Chemical Engineer. 37-39.(2010).
Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 95-98.(2009).
Reflections from Prof Nick Pidgeon. A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. 32.(2009).
Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. AZoM.com.(2009).
Developments in nanotechnology public engagement in the UK: ‘upstream’ towards sustainability?. Journal of Cleaner Production . 16, 1010-1013.(2008).
Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Understanding of Science. 16, 345–364.(2008).
Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement. ( , Ed.).Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives. 349-361.(2008).
Upstream engagement. Scientific and Public Affairs. 11.(2008).
Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently?. Nanoethics, Special Issue. 1, 123-176.(2007).