- News + Media
Filters: Author is Nick Pidgeon [Clear All Filters]
Deliberation and responsible innovation: a geoengineering case study. ( , Ed.).Responsible Innovation. 219-240.(2013).
Nanotechnologies and Upstream Public Engagement: Dilemmas, Debates and Prospects?. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 247-283.(2012).
Opportunities and Uncertainties: The British Nanotechnologies Report and the Case for Upstream Societal Dialogue. ( , Ed.).Valdor 2006: values in decisions on risk: proceedings. 371-378.(2006).
Risk and uncertainty. Trust in science: The Dialogue With Society. 40-45.(2006).
Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement. ( , Ed.).Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives. 349-361.(2008).
A Transatlantic Conversation on Responsible Innovation and Responsible Governance. ( , Ed.).Little by Little: Expansions of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. 169-180.(2012).
Deliberating Stratospheric Aerosols for Climate Geoengineering and the SPICE Project. Nature Climate Change. 3,(2013).
Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 95-98.(2009).
Developments in nanotechnology public engagement in the UK: ‘upstream’ towards sustainability?. Journal of Cleaner Production . 16, 1010-1013.(2008).
Exploring early responses to geoengineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (A). 307, 4176-4196.(2012).
Geoengineering the Climate: The Social and Ethical Implications. Environment. 52, 24-37.(2010).
Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently?. Nanoethics, Special Issue. 1, 123-176.(2007).
Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Understanding of Science. 16, 345–364.(2008).
Nanotech: Good or Bad?. The Chemical Engineer. 37-39.(2010).
Nanotechnologies Risk Perception and Communication (Special Collection). Risk Analysis. 31, 1649-1783.(2011).
Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue). 31, 1694–1700.(2011).
Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’?. Health, Risk & Society, Special Issue. 9, 191-210.(2007).
Opinion: Shale gas and public acceptability. Ingenia. 10-11.(2012).
The Oxford Principles. Climactic Change.(2013).
Reflecting Upon the UK's citizens' Jury on Nanotechnologies: Nano Jury UK. Nanotechnology Law and Business. 2, 167-178.(2006).
The Role of Social and Decision Sciences in Communicating Uncertain Climate Risks. Nature Climate Change. 1,(2011).