- News + Media
Filters: Author is Nick Pidgeon [Clear All Filters]
Upstream engagement. Scientific and Public Affairs. 11.(2008).
Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. AZoM.com.(2009).
Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement. ( , Ed.).Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives. 349-361.(2008).
Reflections from Prof Nick Pidgeon. A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. pg 32.(2009).
Reflecting Upon the UK's citizens' Jury on Nanotechnologies: Nano Jury UK. Nanotechnology Law and Business. 2, 167-178.(2006).
Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’?. Health, Risk & Society, Special Issue. 9, 191-210.(2007).
Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue). 31, 1694–1700.(2011).
Nanotech: Good or Bad?. The Chemical Engineer. 37-39.(2010).
Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Understanding of Science. 16, 345–364.(2008).
Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently?. Nanoethics, Special Issue. 1, 123-176.(2007).
Geoengineering the Planet: The Social and Ethical Implications. Environment. 52, 24-37.(2010).
Developments in Nanotechnology Public Engagement in the UK: ‘Pstream’ Towards Sustainability?. Journal of Cleaner Production . 16, 1010-1013.(2008).
Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 95-98.(2009).