- News + Media
Filters: Author is Nick Pidgeon [Clear All Filters]
Upstream engagement. Scientific and Public Affairs. 11.(2008).
A Transatlantic Conversation on Responsible Innovation and Responsible Governance. ( , Ed.).Little by Little: Expansions of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. 169-180.(2012).
The Role of Social and Decision Sciences in Communicating Uncertain Climate Risks. Nature Climate Change. 1,(2011).
Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. AZoM.com.(2009).
Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement. ( , Ed.).Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives. 349-361.(2008).
Risk and uncertainty. Trust in science: The Dialogue With Society. 40-45.(2006).
Reflections from Prof Nick Pidgeon. A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. 32.(2009).
Reflecting Upon the UK's citizens' Jury on Nanotechnologies: Nano Jury UK. Nanotechnology Law and Business. 2, 167-178.(2006).
The Oxford Principles. Climactic Change.(2013).
Opportunities and Uncertainties: The British Nanotechnologies Report and the Case for Upstream Societal Dialogue. ( , Ed.).Valdor 2006: values in decisions on risk: proceedings. 371-378.(2006).
Opinion: Shale gas and public acceptability. Ingenia. 10-11.(2012).
Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’?. Health, Risk & Society, Special Issue. 9, 191-210.(2007).
Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue). 31, 1694–1700.(2011).
Nanotechnologies Risk Perception and Communication (Special Collection). Risk Analysis. 31, 1649-1783.(2011).
Nanotechnologies and Upstream Public Engagement: Dilemmas, Debates and Prospects?. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 247-283.(2012).
Nanotech: Good or Bad?. The Chemical Engineer. 37-39.(2010).
Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Understanding of Science. 16, 345–364.(2008).
Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently?. Nanoethics, Special Issue. 1, 123-176.(2007).
Geoengineering the Climate: The Social and Ethical Implications. Environment. 52, 24-37.(2010).
Exploring early responses to geoengineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (A). 307, 4176-4196.(2012).