CNS Publications
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is S [Clear All Filters]
(2009). 21st century STEM careers: Communication perspectives and research opportunities.
(, Ed.).Engaging communication theory, research and pedagogy to communicate for social impact.
(2011). Cap-and-Trade, Emissions Taxes, and Innovation..
(, Ed.).Innovation Policy and the Economy. 11,
(2011). Climbing the Hill: Seeing (and Not Seeing) Epochal Breaks from Multiple Vantage Points.
(, Ed.).Science Transformed?: Debating Claims of an Epochal Break. 54-65.
(2012). Debating Nanoethics: U.S. Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology Applications for Energy and the Environment.
(, Ed.).Debating Science: Deliberation, Values, and the Common Good. 227-249.
(2011). Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in US Nanotech Deliberations.
(, Ed.).Quantum Engagements—Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies.
(2011). Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development.
(, Ed.).Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020. 561-618.
(2010). IPR and US Economic Catchup.
(, Ed.).Intellectual property rights, development, and catch-up . 31-62.
(2010). Promise and Prospects of Nanotechnology.
(, Ed.).The Evolving Role of Science and Technology in Foreign Relations: Implications for International Affairs in the 21st Century.
(2012). Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies.
(, Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 188-197.
(2008). Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement.
(, Ed.).Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives. 349-361.
(2009). Success in State Directed Innovation? Perspectives on China's Plan for the Development of Science and Technology.
(, Ed.).The New Asian Innovation Dynamics: China and India in Perspective. 247-264.
(2010). Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper].
Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting.
(2006). Anthropological research at the UCSB Center for Nanotechnology in Society.
Practicing Anthropology. 28, 38-40.
(2009). Anticipating the Perceived Risk of Nanotechnologies: Will They Be Like Other Controversial Nanotechnologies.
Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 752-758.
(2011). From Biotech to Nanotech: Public Debates about Technological Modification of Food.
Environment and Society: Advances in Research. 2, 149-169.
(2012). Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices.
Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 14, 1-12.
(2011). Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development.
Journal of Nanoparticle Research . 13, 3557-3590.
(2009). Is nanotechnology Changing Scientific Collaboration? Survey Evidence from a Nano-Oriented Campus.
Nature Nanotechnology.
(2010). Nanotech: Good or Bad?.
The Chemical Engineer. 37-39.
(2011). Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges.
Risk Analysis (special issue). 31, 1694–1700.
(2007). Photosensitized NO Release from Water-Soluble Nanoparticle Assemblies.
Journal of the American Chemical Society. 129, 2.
(2008). Quantum Dot Fluorescence Quenching Pathways with Cr(III) Complexes. Photosensitized NO Production from trans-Cr(cyclam)(ONO)2+.
Journal of the American Chemical Society. 130, 168-175.
(2011). Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent US Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions .
Risk Analysis . 31, 1734–1748.
(2009). Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology.
AZoM.com.











