- News + Media
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is S [Clear All Filters]
Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent US Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions . Risk Analysis . 31, 1734–1748.(2011).
A Transatlantic Conversation on Responsible Innovation and Responsible Governance. ( , Ed.).Little by Little: Expansions of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. 169-180.(2012).
Success in State Directed Innovation? Perspectives on China's Plan for the Development of Science and Technology. ( , Ed.).The New Asian Innovation Dynamics: China and India in Perspective. 247-264.(2009).
The Social Construction of Alaska native Vulnerability to Climate Change. Race, Gender, and Class. 19, 61-79.(2012).
Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. AZoM.com.(2009).
Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement. ( , Ed.).Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives. 349-361.(2008).
Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 188-197.(2012).
Quantum Dot Fluorescence Quenching Pathways with Cr(III) Complexes. Photosensitized NO Production from trans-Cr(cyclam)(ONO)2+. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 130, 168-175.(2008).
The Political Ecology of Adaptation Assistance: Alaska Natives, Displacement, and Relocation. The Journal of Political Ecology. 19, 174-183.(2012).
Political Consumerism: Citizen Activism in Response to Climate Change and other Environmental Problems. ( , Ed.).Climate Change Policy and the Role of Society.(Forthcoming).
Photosensitized NO Release from Water-Soluble Nanoparticle Assemblies. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 129, 2.(2007).
The Oxford Principles. Climactic Change.(2013).
Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue). 31, 1694–1700.(2011).
Nanotechnologies Risk Perception and Communication (Special Collection). Risk Analysis. 31, 1649-1783.(2011).
Nanotech: Good or Bad?. The Chemical Engineer. 37-39.(2010).
"Nanomaterial Risks Expert Workshop Summary". CNS Report.(Forthcoming).
Making nano matter: An inquiry into the discourses of governable science. Science, Technology, & Human Values. 37, 604-626.(2012).
Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development. ( , Ed.).Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020. 561-618.(2011).
Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development. Journal of Nanoparticle Research . 13, 3557-3590.(2011).
The hierarchy of environmental, health, and safety practices, in the US nanotechnology workplace. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 10, 487-495.(2013).
Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 14, 1-12.(2012).