CNS Publications
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is S [Clear All Filters]
(2011). Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent US Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions .
Risk Analysis . 31, 1734–1748.
(2009). Success in State Directed Innovation? Perspectives on China's Plan for the Development of Science and Technology.
(, Ed.).The New Asian Innovation Dynamics: China and India in Perspective. 247-264.
(2009). Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology.
AZoM.com.
(2008). Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement.
(, Ed.).Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives. 349-361.
(2012). Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies.
(, Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 188-197.
(2008). Quantum Dot Fluorescence Quenching Pathways with Cr(III) Complexes. Photosensitized NO Production from trans-Cr(cyclam)(ONO)2+.
Journal of the American Chemical Society. 130, 168-175.
(2010). Promise and Prospects of Nanotechnology.
(, Ed.).The Evolving Role of Science and Technology in Foreign Relations: Implications for International Affairs in the 21st Century.
(2007). Photosensitized NO Release from Water-Soluble Nanoparticle Assemblies.
Journal of the American Chemical Society. 129, 2.
(2011). Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges.
Risk Analysis (special issue). 31, 1694–1700.
(2010). Nanotech: Good or Bad?.
The Chemical Engineer. 37-39.
(2009). Is nanotechnology Changing Scientific Collaboration? Survey Evidence from a Nano-Oriented Campus.
Nature Nanotechnology.
(2010). IPR and US Economic Catchup.
(, Ed.).Intellectual property rights, development, and catch-up . 31-62.
(2011). Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development.
(, Ed.).Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020. 561-618.
(2011). Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development.
Journal of Nanoparticle Research . 13, 3557-3590.
(2012). Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices.
Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 14, 1-12.
(2010). Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper].
Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting.
(2011). From Biotech to Nanotech: Public Debates about Technological Modification of Food.
Environment and Society: Advances in Research. 2, 149-169.
(2011). Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in US Nanotech Deliberations.
(, Ed.).Quantum Engagements—Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies.
(2012). Debating Nanoethics: U.S. Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology Applications for Energy and the Environment.
(, Ed.).Debating Science: Deliberation, Values, and the Common Good. 227-249.
(2011). Climbing the Hill: Seeing (and Not Seeing) Epochal Breaks from Multiple Vantage Points.
(, Ed.).Science Transformed?: Debating Claims of an Epochal Break. 54-65.
(2011). Cap-and-Trade, Emissions Taxes, and Innovation..
(, Ed.).Innovation Policy and the Economy. 11,
(2009). Anticipating the Perceived Risk of Nanotechnologies: Will They Be Like Other Controversial Nanotechnologies.
Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 752-758.
(2006). Anthropological research at the UCSB Center for Nanotechnology in Society.
Practicing Anthropology. 28, 38-40.











