- News + Media
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is R [Clear All Filters]
Center for Nanotechnology in Society-UC Santa Barbara. Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology and Society. 80-82.(2010).
Friends of the Earth. ( , Ed.).Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology and Society.(2010).
iPod Nano. Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology and Society. ??.(2010).
Letter to the Editor Regarding Nanoethics. The New Atlantis. 17,(2007).
China’s Nanotechnology Patent Landscape: An Analysis of Invention Patents Filed with the State Intellectual Property Office. Nanotechnology Law and Business. 6, 524-539.(2009).
Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 95-98.(2009).
Developments in Nanotechnology Public Engagement in the UK: ‘Pstream’ Towards Sustainability?. Journal of Cleaner Production . 16, 1010-1013.(2008).
From Biotech to Nanotech: Public Debates about Technological Modification of Food. Environment and Society: Advances in Research. 2, 149-169.(2011).
Health Risk Assessment for Nanoparticles: A Case for Using Expert Judgement. Journal of Nanoparticle Research . 9, 137-156.(2007).
The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation. Environmental Science and Technology. 43, 3030-3034.(2009).
Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development. Journal of Nanoparticle Research . 13, 3557-3590.(2011).
Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently?. Nanoethics, Special Issue. 1, 123-176.(2007).
Knowledge Production and Nanotechnology: Characterizing American Dissertation Research, 1999-2009. Technology in Society. 1-11.(2012).
Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Understanding of Science. 16, 345–364.(2008).
Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’?. Health, Risk & Society, Special Issue. 9, 191-210.(2007).
Reflecting Upon the UK's citizens' Jury on Nanotechnologies: Nano Jury UK. Nanotechnology Law and Business. 2, 167-178.(2006).
Upstream engagement. Scientific and Public Affairs. 11.(2008).
Conference Papers and Proceedings
Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper]. Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting.(2010).
Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US. University of Washington Center for Workforce Development.(2009).
Climbing the Hill: Seeing (and Not Seeing) Epochal Breaks from Multiple Vantage Points. ( , Ed.).Science Transformed?: Debating Claims of an Epochal Break. 54-65.(2011).
Debating Nanoethics: U.S. Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology Applications for Energy and the Environment. ( , Ed.).Debating Science: Deliberation, Values, and the Common Good. 227-249.(2012).
Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in US Nanotech Deliberations. ( , Ed.).Quantum Engagements—Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies.(2011).
Food Security: From the Green Revolution to Nanotechnology. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 75-85.(2012).
Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development. ( , Ed.).Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020. 561-618.(2011).
Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 188-197.(2012).