CNS Publications
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is R [Clear All Filters]
(2011). Climbing the Hill: Seeing (and Not Seeing) Epochal Breaks from Multiple Vantage Points.
(, Ed.).Science Transformed?: Debating Claims of an Epochal Break. 54-65.
(2012). Debating Nanoethics: U.S. Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology Applications for Energy and the Environment.
(, Ed.).Debating Science: Deliberation, Values, and the Common Good. 227-249.
(2011). Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in US Nanotech Deliberations.
(, Ed.).Quantum Engagements—Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies.
(2012). Food Security: From the Green Revolution to Nanotechnology.
(, Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 75-85.
(2011). Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development.
(, Ed.).Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020. 561-618.
(2012). Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies.
(, Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 188-197.
(2011). Using Expert Judgment for Risk Assessment.
(, Ed.).Assessing Nanoparticle Risks to Human Health. 110-138.
(2010). Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper].
Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting.
(2009). Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US.
University of Washington Center for Workforce Development.
(2009). China’s Nanotechnology Patent Landscape: An Analysis of Invention Patents Filed with the State Intellectual Property Office.
Nanotechnology Law and Business. 6, 524-539.
(2009). Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom.
Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 95-98.
(2008). Developments in Nanotechnology Public Engagement in the UK: ‘Pstream’ Towards Sustainability?.
Journal of Cleaner Production . 16, 1010-1013.
(2011). From Biotech to Nanotech: Public Debates about Technological Modification of Food.
Environment and Society: Advances in Research. 2, 149-169.
(2007). Health Risk Assessment for Nanoparticles: A Case for Using Expert Judgement.
Journal of Nanoparticle Research . 9, 137-156.
(2009). The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation.
Environmental Science and Technology. 43, 3030-3034.
(2011). Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development.
Journal of Nanoparticle Research . 13, 3557-3590.
(2007). Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently?.
Nanoethics, Special Issue. 1, 123-176.
(2012). Knowledge Production and Nanotechnology: Characterizing American Dissertation Research, 1999-2009.
Technology in Society. 1-11.
(2008). Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry.
Public Understanding of Science. 16, 345–364.
(2007). Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’?.
Health, Risk & Society, Special Issue. 9, 191-210.
(2006). Reflecting Upon the UK's citizens' Jury on Nanotechnologies: Nano Jury UK.
Nanotechnology Law and Business. 2, 167-178.
(2008). Upstream engagement.
Scientific and Public Affairs. 11.
(2007). Letter to the Editor Regarding Nanoethics.
The New Atlantis. 17,
(2010). Center for Nanotechnology in Society-UC Santa Barbara.
Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology and Society. 80-82.
(2010). Friends of the Earth.
(, Ed.).Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology and Society.











