- News + Media
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is R [Clear All Filters]
Using Expert Judgment for Risk Assessment. ( , Ed.).Assessing Nanoparticle Risks to Human Health. 110-138.(2011).
Upstream engagement. Scientific and Public Affairs. 11.(2008).
A Transatlantic Conversation on Responsible Innovation and Responsible Governance. ( , Ed.).Little by Little: Expansions of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. 169-180.(2012).
Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 188-197.(2012).
Reflecting Upon the UK's citizens' Jury on Nanotechnologies: Nano Jury UK. Nanotechnology Law and Business. 2, 167-178.(2006).
The Oxford Principles. Climactic Change.(2013).
Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’?. Health, Risk & Society, Special Issue. 9, 191-210.(2007).
Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Understanding of Science. 16, 345–364.(2008).
Learning From Solyndra: Filling Gaps in the US Innovation System. ( , Ed.).What's In It for Emerging Countries.(Forthcoming).
Knowledge Production and Nanotechnology: Characterizing American Dissertation Research, 1999-2009. Technology in Society. 34, 127-137.(2012).
iPod Nano. ( , Ed.).Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. 363-365.(2010).
Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently?. Nanoethics, Special Issue. 1, 123-176.(2007).
Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development. ( , Ed.).Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020. 561-618.(2011).
Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development. Journal of Nanoparticle Research . 13, 3557-3590.(2011).
Innovative and Responsible Governance of Converging Technologies. ( , Ed.).Innovative and Responsible Governance of Converging Technologies. OECD Workshop Report on Bridging the Divide Between Policy, Practice and Research on Public Engagement on Nanotechnologies.(2013).
The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation. Environmental Science and Technology. 43, 3030-3034.(2009).
Health Risk Assessment for Nanoparticles: A Case for Using Expert Judgment. Journal of Nanoparticle Research . 9, 137-156.(2007).
Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US. University of Washington Center for Workforce Development.(2009).
Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper]. Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting.(2010).
From Biotech to Nanotech: Public Debates about Technological Modification of Food. Environment and Society: Advances in Research. 2, 149-169.(2011).
Friends of the Earth Nanotechnology Project. ( , Ed.).Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. 261-262.(2010).
Food Security: From the Green Revolution to Nanotechnology. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 75-85.(2012).
Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in US Nanotech Deliberations. ( , Ed.).Quantum Engagements: Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. 75-89.(2011).
Different Uses, Different Responses: Exploring Emergent Cultural Values through Public Deliberation. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 195-222.(2012).
Developments in nanotechnology public engagement in the UK: ‘upstream’ towards sustainability?. Journal of Cleaner Production . 16, 1010-1013.(2008).