- News + Media
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is R [Clear All Filters]
Center for Nanotechnology in Society-UC Santa Barbara. ( , Ed.).Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. 80-82.(2010).
China’s Nanotechnology Patent Landscape: An Analysis of Invention Patents Filed with the State Intellectual Property Office. Nanotechnology Law and Business. 6, 524-539.(2009).
Climbing the Hill: Seeing (and Not Seeing) Epochal Breaks from Multiple Vantage Points. ( , Ed.).Science Transformed?: Debating Claims of an Epochal Break. 54-65.(2011).
Correspondence: Debating Nanoethics. The New Atlantis. 17(Summer),(2007).
Debating Nanoethics: U.S. Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology Applications for Energy and the Environment. ( , Ed.).Debating Science: Deliberation, Values, and the Common Good. 227-249.(2012).
Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 95-98.(2009).
Developments in nanotechnology public engagement in the UK: ‘upstream’ towards sustainability?. Journal of Cleaner Production . 16, 1010-1013.(2008).
Different Uses, Different Responses: Exploring Emergent Cultural Values through Public Deliberation. ( , Ed.).The Social Life of Nanotechnology. 195-222.(2012).
Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in US Nanotech Deliberations. ( , Ed.).Quantum Engagements: Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. 75-89.(2011).
Food Security: From the Green Revolution to Nanotechnology. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 75-85.(2012).
Friends of the Earth Nanotechnology Project. ( , Ed.).Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. 261-262.(2010).
From Biotech to Nanotech: Public Debates about Technological Modification of Food. Environment and Society: Advances in Research. 2, 149-169.(2011).
Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper]. Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting.(2010).
Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US. University of Washington Center for Workforce Development.(2009).
Health Risk Assessment for Nanoparticles: A Case for Using Expert Judgment. Journal of Nanoparticle Research . 9, 137-156.(2007).
The impact of toxicity testing costs on nanomaterial regulation. Environmental Science and Technology. 43, 3030-3034.(2009).
Innovative and Responsible Governance of Converging Technologies. ( , Ed.).Innovative and Responsible Governance of Converging Technologies. OECD Workshop Report on Bridging the Divide Between Policy, Practice and Research on Public Engagement on Nanotechnologies.(2013).
Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development. ( , Ed.).Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020. 561-618.(2011).
Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development. Journal of Nanoparticle Research . 13, 3557-3590.(2011).
Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently?. Nanoethics, Special Issue. 1, 123-176.(2007).
iPod Nano. ( , Ed.).Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. 363-365.(2010).
Knowledge Production and Nanotechnology: Characterizing American Dissertation Research, 1999-2009. Technology in Society. 34, 127-137.(2012).
Learning From Solyndra: Filling Gaps in the US Innovation System. ( , Ed.).What's In It for Emerging Countries.(Forthcoming).
Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Understanding of Science. 16, 345–364.(2008).
Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’?. Health, Risk & Society, Special Issue. 9, 191-210.(2007).