- News + Media
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is P [Clear All Filters]
Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: High-tech Industry Growth in China. Department of Sociology . PhD,(2010).
Reflections from Prof Nick Pidgeon. A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. 32.(2009).
Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. AZoM.com.(2009).
China's Bid to be the Global Nanotech Leader: Advancing Nanotechnology Through State-Led Programs and International Collaborations. Science and Public Policy. 35, 319-334.(2008).
China’s Nanotechnology Patent Landscape: An Analysis of Invention Patents Filed with the State Intellectual Property Office. Nanotechnology Law and Business. 6, 524-539.(2009).
Deliberating Stratospheric Aerosols for Climate Geoengineering and the SPICE Project. Nature Climate Change. 3,(2013).
Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 95-98.(2009).
Developmental state and innovation: Nanotechnology in China. Global Networks. 11, 298–314.(2011).
Developments in nanotechnology public engagement in the UK: ‘upstream’ towards sustainability?. Journal of Cleaner Production . 16, 1010-1013.(2008).
Exploring early responses to geoengineering. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (A). 307, 4176-4196.(2012).
From the Ground Up: Developing an Interdisciplinary Course Focusing on Materials Science and Society in Green Technologies. Journal of Materials Education. 31, 251-264.(2009).
Geoengineering the Climate: The Social and Ethical Implications. Environment. 52, 24-37.(2010).
Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently?. Nanoethics, Special Issue. 1, 123-176.(2007).
Messing with Nature: Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Global Environmental Change.(2013).
Mexico-U.S. scientific collaboration in nanotechnology. Revista Frontera Norte (english edition) . 24, 145-164.(2012).
Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Understanding of Science. 16, 345–364.(2008).
Nanotech: Good or Bad?. The Chemical Engineer. 37-39.(2010).
Nanotechnologies Risk Perception and Communication (Special Collection). Risk Analysis. 31, 1649-1783.(2011).
Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue). 31, 1694–1700.(2011).
The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Federal Support for Science and Technology, or Hidden Industrial Policy?. Technology in Society. 33, 109-118.(2011).
Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’?. Health, Risk & Society, Special Issue. 9, 191-210.(2007).
Opinion: Shale gas and public acceptability. Ingenia. 10-11.(2012).