- News + Media
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is P [Clear All Filters]
Where Nano Came From. ( , Ed.).Nanotechnology and the Public: Risk Perception and Risk Communication. 9-32.(2012).
Upstream engagement. Scientific and Public Affairs. 11.(2008).
Traveling Technologies: Societal Implications of Nanotechnology through the Global Value Chain. Journal of Nano Education. 3, 36-44.(2011).
Success in State Directed Innovation? Perspectives on China's Plan for the Development of Science and Technology. ( , Ed.).The New Asian Innovation Dynamics: China and India in Perspective. 247-264.(2009).
Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: High-tech Industry Growth in China. Department of Sociology .(2010).
The Role of Social and Decision Sciences in Communicating Uncertain Climate Risks. Nature Climate Change. 1,(2011).
Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. AZoM.com.(2009).
Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement. ( , Ed.).Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives. 349-361.(2008).
Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 188-197.(2012).
Risk and uncertainty. Trust in science: The Dialogue With Society. 40-45.(2006).
Reflections from Prof Nick Pidgeon. A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. pg 32.(2009).
Reflecting Upon the UK's citizens' Jury on Nanotechnologies: Nano Jury UK. Nanotechnology Law and Business. 2, 167-178.(2006).
Perspective: What have the Mass Media been Reporting on Nanotechnology Risks?. ( , Ed.).Nanotechnology and the Public: Risk Perception and Risk Communication. 157-165.(2012).
Opportunities and Uncertainties: The British Nanotechnologies Report and the Case for Upstream Societal Dialogue. ( , Ed.).Proceedings of VALDOR K. 371-378.(2006).
Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’?. Health, Risk & Society, Special Issue. 9, 191-210.(2007).
The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Federal Support for Science and Technology, or Hidden Industrial Policy?. Technology in Society. 33, 109-118.(2011).
Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue). 31, 1694–1700.(2011).
Nanotech: Good or Bad?. The Chemical Engineer. 37-39.(2010).
Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Understanding of Science. 16, 345–364.(2008).
Introduction: The Promise and Perils of High-Tech Approaches to Development, introductory chapter. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 1-20.(2012).
Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently?. Nanoethics, Special Issue. 1, 123-176.(2007).
Implications of Nanotechnology for Labor and Employment: Assessing Nanotechnology Products in Brazil. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 140-152.(2012).
Geoengineering the Planet: The Social and Ethical Implications. Environment. 52, 24-37.(2010).
From the Ground Up: Developing an Interdisciplinary Course Focusing on Materials Science and Society in Green Technologies. Journal of Materials Education. 31, 251-264.(2009).