- News + Media
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is P [Clear All Filters]
Upstream engagement. Scientific and Public Affairs. 11.(2008).
Traveling Technologies: Societal Implications of Nanotechnology through the Global Value Chain. Journal of Nano Education. 3, 36-44.(2011).
A Transatlantic Conversation on Responsible Innovation and Responsible Governance. ( , Ed.).Little by Little: Expansions of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies. 169-180.(2012).
Success in State Directed Innovation? Perspectives on China's Plan for the Development of Science and Technology. ( , Ed.).The New Asian Innovation Dynamics: China and India in Perspective. 247-264.(2009).
Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: High-tech Industry Growth in China. Department of Sociology . PhD,(2010).
The Role of Social and Decision Sciences in Communicating Uncertain Climate Risks. Nature Climate Change. 1,(2011).
Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology. AZoM.com.(2009).
Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement. ( , Ed.).Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives. 349-361.(2008).
Risk perception, public participation, and sustainable global development of nanotechnologies. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 188-197.(2012).
Risk and uncertainty. Trust in science: The Dialogue With Society. 40-45.(2006).
Research is High and the Market is Far Away - Commercialization of Nanotechnology in China. Technology in Society. 35, 55-64.(2013).
Reflections from Prof Nick Pidgeon. A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering report: Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies: Opportunities and Uncertainties. 32.(2009).
Reflecting Upon the UK's citizens' Jury on Nanotechnologies: Nano Jury UK. Nanotechnology Law and Business. 2, 167-178.(2006).
Perspective: Where Nano Came From. ( , Ed.).Nanotechnology and the Public: Risk Perception and Risk Communication. 9-32.(2012).
Perspective: What have the Mass Media been Reporting on Nanotechnology Risks?. ( , Ed.).Nanotechnology and the Public: Risk Perception and Risk Communication. 157-165.(2012).
The Oxford Principles. Climactic Change.(2013).
Opportunities and Uncertainties: The British Nanotechnologies Report and the Case for Upstream Societal Dialogue. ( , Ed.).Valdor 2006: values in decisions on risk: proceedings. 371-378.(2006).
Opinion: Shale gas and public acceptability. Ingenia. 10-11.(2012).
Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’?. Health, Risk & Society, Special Issue. 9, 191-210.(2007).
The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Federal Support for Science and Technology, or Hidden Industrial Policy?. Technology in Society. 33, 109-118.(2011).
Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue). 31, 1694–1700.(2011).