- News + Media
Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is P [Clear All Filters]
21st century STEM careers: Communication perspectives and research opportunities. ( , Ed.).Engaging communication theory, research and pedagogy to communicate for social impact.(2009).
Achieving Equitable Outcomes Through Emerging Technologies: A Social Empowerment Approach. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 40-46.(2012).
China's (Not So Hidden) Developmental State: Becoming a Leading Nanotechnology Innovator in the Twenty-first Century. ( , Ed.).State of Innovation: The U.S. Government's Role in Technology Development. 217-235.(2011).
China's Bid to be the Global Nanotech Leader: Advancing Nanotechnology Through State-Led Programs and International Collaborations. Science and Public Policy. 35, 319-334.(2008).
China’s Nanotechnology Patent Landscape: An Analysis of Invention Patents Filed with the State Intellectual Property Office. Nanotechnology Law and Business. 6, 524-539.(2009).
Conversions: Sound and Sight, Military and Civilian. ( , Ed.).Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies. 224-248.(2012).
Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 95-98.(2009).
Developmental state and innovation: Nanotechnology in China. Global Networks. 11, 298–314.(2011).
Developments in Nanotechnology Public Engagement in the UK: ‘Pstream’ Towards Sustainability?. Journal of Cleaner Production . 16, 1010-1013.(2008).
Food Security: From the Green Revolution to Nanotechnology. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 75-85.(2012).
From the Ground Up: Developing an Interdisciplinary Course Focusing on Materials Science and Society in Green Technologies. Journal of Materials Education. 31, 251-264.(2009).
Geoengineering the Planet: The Social and Ethical Implications. Environment. 52, 24-37.(2010).
Implications of Nanotechnology for Labor and Employment: Assessing Nanotechnology Products in Brazil. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 140-152.(2012).
Introduction: Engaging with Nanotechnologies – Engaging Differently?. Nanoethics, Special Issue. 1, 123-176.(2007).
Introduction: The Promise and Perils of High-Tech Approaches to Development, introductory chapter. ( , Ed.).Can Emerging Technologies Make a Difference in Development?. 1-20.(2012).
Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering's inquiry. Public Understanding of Science. 16, 345–364.(2008).
Nanotech: Good or Bad?. The Chemical Engineer. 37-39.(2010).
Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue). 31, 1694–1700.(2011).
The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Federal Support for Science and Technology, or Hidden Industrial Policy?. Technology in Society. 33, 109-118.(2011).
Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Risk Communication or ‘Upstream Engagement’?. Health, Risk & Society, Special Issue. 9, 191-210.(2007).
Opportunities and Uncertainties: The British Nanotechnologies Report and the Case for Upstream Societal Dialogue. ( , Ed.).Proceedings of VALDOR K. 371-378.(2006).
Perspective: What have the Mass Media been Reporting on Nanotechnology Risks?. ( , Ed.).Nanotechnology and the Public: Risk Perception and Risk Communication. 157-165.(2012).