CNS Publications

Found 35 results

Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is H  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G [H] I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
2
Putnam, L., Kisselburgh L. G., Berkelaar B. L., Buzzanell P. M., Mastronardi M., Jackson M., et al. (2009).  21st century STEM careers: Communication perspectives and research opportunities. (L. Harter, M. J. Dutta, Ed.).Engaging communication theory, research and pedagogy to communicate for social impact.
A
Harthorn, B. H. (2010).  Amplification of Risk. Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology. 669-670.
Harthorn, B. H., McCray P. W., & Satterfield T. (2006).  Anthropological research at the UCSB Center for Nanotechnology in Society. Practicing Anthropology. 28, 38-40.
Satterfield, T., Kandlikar M., Beaudrie C., Conti J. A., & Harthorn B. H. (2009).  Anticipating the Perceived Risk of Nanotechnologies: Will They Be Like Other Controversial Nanotechnologies. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 752-758.
Harthorn, B. H. (2010).  Attenuation of Risk. <i>Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology</i>. 671-672.
D
Harthorn, B., Rogers J., Shearer C., & Martin T. (2012).  Debating Nanoethics: U.S. Public Perceptions of Nanotechnology Applications for Energy and the Environment. (Dane Scott, Blake Francis, Ed.).Debating Science: Deliberation, Values, and the Common Good. 227-249.
Pidgeon, N., Harthorn B. H., Bryant K., & Rogers-Hayden T. (2009).  Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 95-98.
E
Harthorn, B., Shearer C., & Rogers J. (2011).  Exploring Ambivalence: Techno-Enthusiasm and Skepticism in US Nanotech Deliberations. (Torben Zuelsdorf, Ed.).Quantum Engagements—Social Reflections of Nanoscience and Emerging Technologies.
F
Mowery, D. C. (2011).  Federal Policy and the Development of Semiconductors, Computer Hardware, and Computer software: A policy Model for Climate-Change R&D?. (R. Henderson, R. G. Newell, Ed.).Accelerating Energy Innovation: Lesson from Multiple Sectors.
Rogers-Brown, J. B., Shearer C., & Harthorn B. H. (2011).  From Biotech to Nanotech: Public Debates about Technological Modification of Food. Environment and Society: Advances in Research. 2, 149-169.
Murr, M. M., Patterson S. E., Hu E. L., Goodchild F. M., & McCray P. W. (2009).  From the Ground Up: Developing an Interdisciplinary Course Focusing on Materials Science and Society in Green Technologies. Journal of Materials Education. 31, 251-264.
G
Harthorn, B. H. (2010).  Gender and Nanotechnology. Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology. 269-271.
Harthorn, B. H., Rogers J., & Shearer C. (2010).  Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper]. Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting.
Harthorn, B. H., Bryant K., & Rogers J. (2009).  Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US. University of Washington Center for Workforce Development.
Mehta, A., Herron P., Motoyama Y., Appelbaum R., & Lenoir T. (2012).  Globalization and De-globalization in Nanotechnology Research: The Role of China. Scientometrics (forthcoming). 1-20.
Engeman, C. D., Baumgartner L., Carr B. M., Fish A. M., Meyerhofer J. D., Satterfield T. A., et al. (2012).  Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 14, 1-12.
H
Conti, J. A., Killpack K., Gerritzen G., Huang L., Mircheva M., Delmas M., et al. (2008).  Health and Safety Practices in the Nanotechnology Workplace: Results From an International Survey. Environmental Science and Technology. 42, 3155-3262.
I
Roco, M., Harthorn B. H., Guston D., & Shapira P. (2011).  Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development. (Roco, Mihail, Mark C. Hersam, Ed.).Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020. 561-618.
Roco, M. C., Harthorn B., Guston D., & Shapira P. (2011).  Innovative and responsible governance of nanotechnology for societal development. Journal of Nanoparticle Research . 13, 3557-3590.
M
Harthorn, B. H. (2011).  Methodological Challenges Posed by Emergent Nanotechnologies and Cultural Values. (Sharlene Nagy Hesse-Biber, Ed.).The Handbook of Emergent Technologies and Social Research.
N
Harthorn, B. H. (2006).  Nano-buzz: Social Dimensions of Emerging Technologies. Anthropology News. 47, 26.
Pidgeon, N., Harthorn B., & Satterfield T. (2010).  Nanotech: Good or Bad?. The Chemical Engineer. 37-39.
Pidgeon, N., Harthorn B., & Satterfield T. (2011).  Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue). 31, 1694–1700.
Ostrowski, A. D., Martin T., Conti J. A., Hurt I., & Harthorn B. H. (2009).  Nanotoxicology: Characterizing the Scientific Literature: 2000-2007. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 11, 251-257.
O
Mody, C., & Hansma P. K. (2007).  Oral History Interview.