CNS Publications

Found 25 results

Filters: First Letter Of Last Name is B  [Clear All Filters]
A [B] C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
V
Johansson, M. (2010).  Vi är dina provexemplar - om etnografiskt fältarbete i laboratoriemiljö (We are your samples - On ethnographic fieldwork in laboratory environments). (J. Bärmark, Ed.).Att tänka genom kulturer (To think through cultures).
U
Beaudrie, C.E.H., Kandlikar M., & Ramachandran G. (2011).  Using Expert Judgment for Risk Assessment. (Ramachandran, G., Ed.).Assessing Nanoparticle Risks to Human Health. 110-138.
Godwin, H. A., Chopra K., Bradley K., Cohen Y., Harthorn B. H., Hoek E. M. V., et al. (2009).  The University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology. Environmental Science and Technology. 43, 6453-6457.
Brock, D. (2011).  The Uncertain Future of Moore’s Law - The Rise of 3-D Transistors and What it Means for Technology in the 21st Century. Science Progress. 1-5.
T
Lenoir, T., & Gianella E. (2008).  Technological Platforms and the Layers of Patent Data. (E. Gianella, M. Biagioli, P. Jaszi, M. Woodmansee, Ed.).Con/Texts of Invention: Creative Production in Legal and Cultural Perspective.
S
Weaver, D. A., Lively E., & Bimber B. (2009).  Searching for a Frame: Media Tell the Story of Technological Progress, Risk, and Regulation in the Case of Nanotechnology. Science Communication. 31, 139-166.
R
McCarty, P., Lively E., Weaver D., Mohr J., & Bimber B. (2008).  The Role of Governmental and Non-Governmental Institutions in Framing Nanotechnology as a Social Issue.
Pidgeon, N. (2008).  Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement. (Gabriele Bammer, Michael Smithson, Ed.).Uncertainty and Risk: Multidisciplinary perspectives. 349-361.
Barnett, G. (2011).  Recombinant Innovation. Review of Genentech The Beginnings of Biotech by Sally Smith. Science Progress. 334,
N
Negoita, M., & Block F. (2012).  Networks and Public Policies in the Global South: The Chilean Case and the Future of the Developmental Network State. Studies in Comparative International Development . 47, 1-22.
I
Newfield, C. (2010).  Is the Corporation a Social Partner? The Case of Nanotechnology. (Purnima Bose, Laura E. Lyons, Ed.).Cultural critique and the global corporation. 215-224.
H
Beaudrie, C., & Kandlikar M. (2011).  Horses for Courses: Risk Information and Decision Making in the Regulation of Nanomaterials. Journal of Nanoparticle Research . Special Focus: Governance of Nanobiotechnology, 1-12.
G
Engeman, C. D., Baumgartner L., Carr B. M., Fish A. M., Meyerhofer J. D., Satterfield T. A., et al. (2012).  Governance implications of nanomaterials companies’ inconsistent risk perceptions and safety practices. Journal of Nanoparticle Research. 14, 1-12.
Harthorn, B. H., Bryant K., & Rogers J. (2009).  Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US. University of Washington Center for Workforce Development.
F
Newfield, C. (2009).  Fixing the Developmental University: The Case of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. (Fred Block, Matt Keller, Ed.).State of Innovation: US Federal Technology Policies, 1969-2008.
Newfield, C. (2009).  Fixing the Developmental University: The Case of the National Nanotechnology Initiative . State of Innovation: US Federal Technology Policies, 1969-2008.
Weaver, D. A., & Bimber B. (2008).  Finding news stories: A comparision of searches using LexisNexis and Google News. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly. 83, 515-530.
Newfield, C., & Barnett G. (2010).  The Federal Stimulus Should Support Research at Public Universities. Chronicle of Higher Education.
E
Beaudrie, C. (2010).  Emerging Nanotechnologies and Life Cycle Regulation: An Investigation of Federal Regulatory Oversight from Nanomaterial Production to End of Life. Chemical Heritage Foundation. 1-63.
D
Pidgeon, N., Harthorn B. H., Bryant K., & Rogers-Hayden T. (2009).  Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 95-98.
C
Mody, C. C. M. (2012).  Conversions: Sound and Sight, Military and Civilian. (Trevor Pinch, Karin Bijsterveld, Ed.).Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies. 224-248.
Appelbaum, R. P., Parker R., Cao C., & Gereffi G. (2011).  China's (Not So Hidden) Developmental State: Becoming a Leading Nanotechnology Innovator in the Twenty-first Century. (Fred Block, Matthew R. Keller, Ed.).State of Innovation: The U.S. Government's Role in Technology Development. 217-235.
A
Newfield, C. (2010).  Avoiding Network Failure: The Case of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. (Fred Block, Matt Keller, Ed.).State of Innovation: The U.S. Government's Role in Technology Development.
Satterfield, T., Kandlikar M., Beaudrie C., Conti J. A., & Harthorn B. H. (2009).  Anticipating the Perceived Risk of Nanotechnologies: Will They Be Like Other Controversial Nanotechnologies. Nature Nanotechnology. 4, 752-758.
2
Putnam, L., Kisselburgh L. G., Berkelaar B. L., Buzzanell P. M., Mastronardi M., Jackson M., et al. (2009).  21st century STEM careers: Communication perspectives and research opportunities. (L. Harter, M. J. Dutta, Ed.).Engaging communication theory, research and pedagogy to communicate for social impact.