CNS Publications Library

2011

  • Mody, C. (2011). Climbing the Hill: Seeing (and Not Seeing) Epochal Breaks from Multiple Vantage Points. In Nordmann, A., Radder H., & Schiemann G. (Eds.),. Science Transformed?: Debating Claims of an Epochal Break, (pp. 54-65). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
  • Motoyama, Y., Appelbaum R. P., & Parker R. (2011). The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Federal Support for Science and Technology, or Hidden Industrial Policy?. Technology in Society, (33)(1-2), (pp. 109-118). Retrieved from
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X1100011X
    doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.03.010
  • Motoyama, Y., & Eisler M. N. (2011). Bibliometry and Nanotechnology: A Meta-Analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (78), (pp. 1174-1182). Retrieved from
    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162511000655
    doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.013
  • Mowery, D. C. (2011). Federal Policy and the Development of Semiconductors, Computer Hardware, and Computer software: A policy Model for Climate-Change R&D?. In Henderson, R., & Newell R. G. (Eds.),. Accelerating Energy Innovation: Lesson from Multiple Sectors, (pp. 159 - 188). Cambridge, MA: NBER. Retrieved from
    http://www.nber.org/books/hend09-1
  • Mowery, D. (2011). Nanotechnology and the US National Innovation System: Continuity and Change. The Journal of Technology Transfer, (pp. 1-15). Retrieved from
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10961-011-9210-2
    doi: 10.1007/s10961-011-9210-2
  • Newfield, C. (2011). Was the Innovation Economy Killed by the Debt Debate?. The Hffuington Post. Retrieved from
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/christopher-newfield/innovation-economy-debt-debate_b_917151.html
  • Pidgeon, N., Satterfield T. A., & Harthorn B. H. (2011). Nanotechnologies Risk Perception and Communication (Special Collection). Risk Analysis, (31)(11), (pp. 1649-1783). Retrieved from
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x/full
    doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x
  • Pidgeon, N., Harthorn B. H., & Satterfield T. A. (2011). Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions and Communication: Emerging Technologies, Emerging Challenges. Risk Analysis (special issue), (31)(11), (pp. 1694–1700). Retrieved from
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x/full
    doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01738.x
  • Pidgeon, N., & Fischhoff B. (2011). The Role of Social and Decision Sciences in Communicating Uncertain Climate Risks. Nature Climate Change, (1)(1). doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE1080
  • Roco, M., Harthorn B. H., Guston D., & Shapira P. (2011). Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development. In Roco, M., & Hersam M. C. (Eds.),. Nanotechnology Research Directions for Societal Needs in 2020, (13)(9), (pp. 561-618). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0454-4
  • Rogers-Brown, J., Shearer C., & Harthorn B. H. (2011). From Biotech to Nanotech: Public Debates about Technological Modification of Food. Environment and Society: Advances in Research, (2)(1), (pp. 149-169). doi: 10.3167/ares.2011.020109
  • Scotchmer, S. (2011). Cap-and-Trade, Emissions Taxes, and Innovation.. In Lerner, J., & Stern S. (Eds.),. Innovation Policy and the Economy, (11)(1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press by the National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from
    http://www.nber.org/chapters/c12047

2010

  • Appelbaum, R. P. (2010). Nanotechnology. In Anheier, H. K., & Juergensmeyer M. (Eds.),. Encyclopedia of Global Studies, (pp. 1205-1208). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Beaudrie, C. (2010). Emerging Nanotechnologies and Life Cycle Regulation: An Investigation of Federal Regulatory Oversight from Nanomaterial Production to End of Life. Chemical Heritage Foundation, (pp. 1-63).
  • Conroy, M. (2010). A Psychology of Framing: The Effects of Personality on Susceptibility to Media Frames. Department of Political Science, (Ph.D.). Santa Barbara: University of California, Santa Barbara. Retrieved from
    http://proquest.umi.com/pqdlink?Ver=1&Exp=02-19-2017&FMT=7&DID=2265984601&RQT=309&attempt=1&cfc=1
  • Corner, A., & Pidgeon N. (2010). Geoengineering the Climate: The Social and Ethical Implications. Environment, (52)(1), (pp. 24-37).
  • Eisler, M. N. (2010). Occupational Safety and Health Enforcement. In Guston, D. H. (Eds.),. Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society, (pp. 610-612). London: Sage.
  • Eisler, M. N. (2010). Department of Energy (DOE). In Guston, D. H. (Eds.),. Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society, (pp. 153-154). London: Sage.
  • Eisler, M. N. (2010). Nanotechnology in Manufacturing. In Guston, D. H. (Eds.),. Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society, (pp. 548-551). London: Sage.
  • Eisler, M. N. (2010). Spintronics. In Guston, D. H. (Eds.),. Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society, (pp. 735-736). London: Sage.
  • Eisler, M. N. (2010). Self-Assembly. In Guston, D. H. (Eds.),. Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society, (pp. 709-710). London: Sage.
  • Eisler, M. N. (2010). Science Policy. In Guston, D. H. (Eds.),. Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society, (pp. 702-704). London: Sage.
  • Harthorn, B. H., Rogers J., & Shearer C. (2010, Jan 29-30). Gender, Application Domain, and Ethical Dilemmas in Nano-Deliberation [White paper]. Nanotech Risk Perception Specialist Meeting. Santa Barbara, CA:.
  • Harthorn, B. H. (2010). Attenuation of Risk. In Guston, D. H. (Eds.),. <i>Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society</i>, (pp. 671-672). London: Sage.
  • Harthorn, B. H. (2010). Amplification of Risk. In Guston, D. H. (Eds.),. Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society, (pp. 669-670). London: Sage.