Interdisciplinary Research Group 3: Affiliated Publications

  • "Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US."
  • “Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement.”
  • "Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology."
  • “Reflecting Upon the UK’s Citizens’ Jury on Nanotechnologies: Nano Jury UK.”
  • “Risk and Uncertainty.”
  • “Nano-Buzz: Societal Dimensions of Emerging Technologies.”
  • “Opening up Nanotechnology Dialogue with the Publics: Moving Beyond Risk Debates to ‘Upstream Engagement.' "
  • “Moving Engagement ‘Upstream’? Nanotechnologies & the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering’s Inquiry.”
  • "Geoengineering the climate: The social and ethical implications."
  • "Emerging Nanotechnologies and Life Cycle Regulation: An Investigation of Federal Regulatory Oversight from Nanomaterial Production to End-of-Life."
  • “Engaging with Nanotechnologies-Engaging Differently? ”
  • “Developments in Public Participation in Nanotechnology: Towards Sustainability.”
  • “Health and Safety Practices in the Nanotechnology Workplace: Results from an International Survey.”
  • “Finding News Stories: A Comparison of Searches Using LexisNexis and Google News.”
  • “Nanotoxicology: Characterizing the Scientific Literature, 2000–2007."
  • “Deliberating the Risks of Nanotechnologies for Energy and Health Applications in the United States and United Kingdom.”
  • “The Impact of Toxicity Testing Costs on Nanomaterial Regulation.”
  • "The University of California Center for the Environmental Implications of Nanotechnology."
  • "Anticipating the Perceived Risk of Nanotechnologies."
  • “Searching for a Frame: Media Tell the Story of Technological Progress, Risk, and Regulation in the Case of Nanotechnology.”
  • "Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology."
  • "Gendered risk beliefs about emerging nanotechnologies in the US. "
  • "Nanotech: Good or Bad? "
  • "Geoengineering the climate: The social and ethical implications."
  • "Designing for upstream risk perception research: Malleability and asymmetry in judgments about nanotechnologies."
  • "Gender, application domain, and ethical dilemmas in nano-deliberation."
  • “Risk, Uncertainty and Social Controversy: From Risk Perception and Communication to Public Engagement.”
  • "Next to Nothing: A study of nanoscientists and their cosmology at a Swedish research laboratory."
  • "Methodological challenges posed by emergent nanotechnologies and cultural values."
  • "Gender and nanotechnology;" "Risk amplification;" "Risk attenuation."
  • "iPod Nano;" "Friends of the Earth;" "Center for Nanotechnology in Society-UC Santa Barbara."
  • "Nano Culture."
  • “Opportunities and Uncertainties: the British Nanotechnologies Report and the Case for Upstream Societal Dialogue."
  • "Upstream Engagement."
  • “The Role of Governmental and Non-Governmental Institutions in Framing Nanotechnology as a Social Issue.”
  • "A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering Report: Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties."
  • "A Beacon or Just a Landmark? Reflections on the 2004 Royal Society/Royal Academy of Engineering Report: Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties."
  • "Emerging Nanotechnologies and Life-Cycle Regulation: An Investigation of Federal Regulatory Oversight from Nanomaterial Production to End of Life"
  • “Searching for a Frame: Media Tell the Story of Technological Progress, Risk, and Regulation in the Case of Nanotechnology.”
  • "Horses for Courses: Risk Information and Decision Making in the Regulation of Nanomaterials."
  • “The Role of Social and Decision Sciences in Communicating Uncertain Climate Risks.”
  • "Vulnerability and Social Justice as Factors in Emergent US Nanotechnology Risk Perceptions."